FKIE_CVE-2024-10119

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-10-18 05:15 - Updated: 2024-11-01 18:40
Severity ?
Summary
The wireless router WRTM326 from SECOM does not properly validate a specific parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker could execute arbitrary system commands by sending crafted requests.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
zte wrtm326_firmware *
zte wrtm326 -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:zte:wrtm326_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5D87CB20-EB64-4B9B-9E63-C57BFBCCA86E",
              "versionEndIncluding": "2.3.20",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:zte:wrtm326:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4B913028-45E6-4BAF-BABA-17B5F53FCBFB",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The wireless router WRTM326 from SECOM does not properly validate a specific parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker could execute arbitrary system commands by sending crafted requests."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El enrutador inal\u00e1mbrico WRTM326 de SECOM no valida correctamente un par\u00e1metro espec\u00edfico. Un atacante remoto no autenticado podr\u00eda ejecutar comandos arbitrarios del sistema mediante el env\u00edo de solicitudes manipuladas."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2024-10119",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-01T18:40:58.367",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "twcert@cert.org.tw",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-10-18T05:15:05.200",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "twcert@cert.org.tw",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-8157-e0461-2.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "twcert@cert.org.tw",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-8156-81c9d-1.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "twcert@cert.org.tw",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-78"
        }
      ],
      "source": "twcert@cert.org.tw",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…