FKIE_CVE-2016-5672
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2016-08-01 02:59 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:intel:crosswalk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7A9BBD23-5F7E-462F-B977-499AEA34C7E3",
"versionEndIncluding": "19.49.514.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Intel Crosswalk en versiones anteriores a 19.49.514.5, 20.x en versiones anteriores a 20.50.533.11, 21.x en versiones anteriores a 21.51.546.0 y 22.x en versiones anteriores a 22.51.549.0 interpreta que una aceptaci\u00f3n por parte de un usuario de un certificado X.509 invalido significa que todos los certificados X.509 deben ser aceptados sin preguntar, lo que facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle espiar servidores SSL y obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible a trav\u00e9s de un certificado manipulado."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-5672",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2016-08-01T02:59:17.870",
"references": [
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
},
{
"source": "cret@cert.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cret@cert.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…