FKIE_CVE-2015-8600

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2015-12-17 19:59 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The SysAdminWebTool servlets in SAP Mobile Platform allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, or have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2227855.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://scn.sap.com/community/security/blog/2015/12/09/sap-security-notes-december-2015--reviewVendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://erpscan.io/advisories/10761/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://scn.sap.com/community/security/blog/2015/12/09/sap-security-notes-december-2015--reviewVendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://erpscan.io/advisories/10761/
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
sap mobile_platform *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sap:mobile_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E4E8959F-4967-42D0-A743-AB4C10740B21",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The SysAdminWebTool servlets in SAP Mobile Platform allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, or have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2227855."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los servlets SysAdminWebTool en SAP Mobile Platform permiten a atacantes remotos eludir la autenticaci\u00f3n y obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible, obtener privilegios o tener otro impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de vectores desconocidos, tambi\u00e9n conocidos como SAP Security Note 2227855."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2015-8600",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": true,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2015-12-17T19:59:12.560",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://scn.sap.com/community/security/blog/2015/12/09/sap-security-notes-december-2015--review"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/10761/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://scn.sap.com/community/security/blog/2015/12/09/sap-security-notes-december-2015--review"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/10761/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-264"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.