FKIE_CVE-2014-4715
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2014-07-03 04:22 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
Yann Collet LZ4 before r119, when used on certain 32-bit platforms that allocate memory beyond 0x80000000, does not properly detect integer overflows, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted Literal Run, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4611.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yann_collet | lz4 | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:yann_collet:lz4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9974F7A5-C2F4-43D1-8ECE-E017FC2A1872",
"versionEndIncluding": "r118",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Yann Collet LZ4 before r119, when used on certain 32-bit platforms that allocate memory beyond 0x80000000, does not properly detect integer overflows, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted Literal Run, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4611."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Yann Collet LZ4 anterior a r119, cuando se utiliza en cierta plataformas de 32-bits que asigna memoria m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de 0x80000000, no detecta correctamente desbordamientos de enteros, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (corrupci\u00f3n de memoria) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de un \u0027Literal Run\u0027 manipulado, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2014-4611."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2014-4715",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2014-07-03T04:22:16.123",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://blog.securitymouse.com/2014/07/i-was-wrong-proving-lz4-exploitable.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://fastcompression.blogspot.fr/2014/07/software-vulnerabilities-how-it-works.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59770"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://code.google.com/p/lz4/issues/detail?id=134"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://code.google.com/p/lz4/source/detail?r=119"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://blog.securitymouse.com/2014/07/i-was-wrong-proving-lz4-exploitable.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://fastcompression.blogspot.fr/2014/07/software-vulnerabilities-how-it-works.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59770"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://code.google.com/p/lz4/issues/detail?id=134"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://code.google.com/p/lz4/source/detail?r=119"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-189"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…