FKIE_CVE-2013-0935

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2013-03-28 15:55 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
EMC Smarts Network Configuration Manager (NCM) before 9.2 does not require authentication for all Java RMI method calls, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
emc smarts_network_configuration_manager *

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emc:smarts_network_configuration_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "ACA2AE84-D37E-4639-8549-984979D2B004",
              "versionEndIncluding": "9.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "EMC Smarts Network Configuration Manager (NCM) before 9.2 does not require authentication for all Java RMI method calls, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "EMC Smarts Network Configuration Manager (NCM) anterior v9.2 no requiere autenticaci\u00f3n para todo los m\u00e9todos de llamada Java RMI, que permite ataques remotos ejecutando c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s de vectores sin especificar."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2013-0935",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "baseScore": 9.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 10.0,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2013-03-28T15:55:01.783",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security_alert@emc.com",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-03/0135.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-03/0135.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security_alert@emc.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…