FKIE_CVE-2010-2522
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2010-07-13 17:30 - Updated: 2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux-ipv6 | umip | 0.4 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:linux-ipv6:umip:0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DBADED00-3C2B-4E97-A91C-EEB9016F6F0D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to spoof netlink socket communication via a crafted unicast message."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El demonio mipv6 en UMIP v0.4 no verifica los mensajes netlink originados en el kernel, lo que permite a usuarios locales falsificar la comunicaci\u00f3n con el socket netlink a trav\u00e9s de mensajes unicast manipulados."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2010-2522",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2010-07-13T17:30:04.187",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41524"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-264"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…