FKIE_CVE-2009-1594

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2009-05-21 14:30 - Updated: 2026-04-23 00:35
Severity ?
Summary
Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the "positive model," which allows remote attackers to bypass certain protection mechanisms via a %0A (encoded newline), as demonstrated by a %0A in a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack URL.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://resources.enablesecurity.com/advisories/ES-20090500-profense.txt
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503649/100/0/threaded
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35053
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2009-05/msg00040.html
cve@mitre.orghttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50662
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://resources.enablesecurity.com/advisories/ES-20090500-profense.txt
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503649/100/0/threaded
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35053
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2009-05/msg00040.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50662
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
armorlogic profense_web_application_firewall *
armorlogic profense_web_application_firewall 2.4
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:armorlogic:profense_web_application_firewall:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4A5BDDC1-14DC-4D05-B3B5-766A5CB761EE",
              "versionEndIncluding": "2.2.21",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:armorlogic:profense_web_application_firewall:2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "15A5DFAE-BD74-448C-95E9-C10D1696BE43",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the \"positive model,\" which allows remote attackers to bypass certain protection mechanisms via a %0A (encoded newline), as demonstrated by a %0A in a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack URL."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall anteriores a v2.2.22, y v2.4.x anteriores a v2.4.4, no implemente apropiadamente el \"modelo positivo\", lo que permite a los atacantes remotos evitar ciertos mecanismos de protecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s de %0A (codificaci\u00f3n de nueva l\u00ednea), como se demuestra por una %0A en un ataque URL de ejecuci\u00f3n de secuencias de comandos en sitios cruzados - XSS"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2009-1594",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-23T00:35:47.467",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2009-05-21T14:30:00.467",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://resources.enablesecurity.com/advisories/ES-20090500-profense.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503649/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35053"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2009-05/msg00040.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50662"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://resources.enablesecurity.com/advisories/ES-20090500-profense.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503649/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35053"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2009-05/msg00040.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50662"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-264"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.