FKIE_CVE-2001-0936

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2001-11-30 05:00 - Updated: 2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in Frox transparent FTP proxy 0.6.6 and earlier, with the local caching method selected, allows remote FTP servers to run arbitrary code via a long response to an MDTM request.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://frox.sourceforge.net/security.txtVendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=100713367307799&w=2
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3606Patch, Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7632
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://frox.sourceforge.net/security.txtVendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=100713367307799&w=2
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3606Patch, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7632
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
frox frox 0.6.0
frox frox 0.6.1
frox frox 0.6.2
frox frox 0.6.3
frox frox 0.6.4
frox frox 0.6.5
frox frox 0.6.6
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "AD003E11-0CC3-4800-A7B3-55916E5AEBA2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "00D7F5D9-B627-4929-BFD5-D7D9F2B92310",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "87EC9715-E4EC-4D9A-8D02-F86A83C70F12",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "FB601BEC-82E8-4C15-9D9F-B29F5E97871D",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6A4B6340-EB71-4D06-989C-F856B774FD4A",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F6A8F22C-6D58-4A30-A537-32B4BB0564A9",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frox:frox:0.6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7CD5D046-DB6E-4D3E-8600-583344EB1A66",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Buffer overflow in Frox transparent FTP proxy 0.6.6 and earlier, with the local caching method selected, allows remote FTP servers to run arbitrary code via a long response to an MDTM request."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2001-0936",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": true,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2001-11-30T05:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://frox.sourceforge.net/security.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100713367307799\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3606"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7632"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://frox.sourceforge.net/security.txt"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100713367307799\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3606"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7632"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.