(CVE-2026-96387)
Vulnerability from drupal – Published: 2026-09-23 17:11 – Updated: 2026-09-23 17:11 – Source websiteThis module enables sites to block access for the administrative user account (user 1) or users with the administrator role.
The module does not sufficiently enforce these access restrictions across all supported authentication mechanisms. As a result, a blocked administrative user may still be able to authenticate through certain alternative authentication methods.
This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must possess valid credentials for a user with the administrator role, and must authenticate using a less commonly used authentication mechanism.
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"affected_versions": "\u003e=1.0 \u003c1.6"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist:https://packages.drupal.org/8",
"name": "drupal/stop_admin"
},
"ranges": [
{
"database_specific": {
"constraint": "\u003e=1.0 \u003c1.6"
},
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.6.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"severity": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-96387"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://www.drupal.org/u/prudloff"
],
"name": "Pierre Rudloff (prudloff)"
}
],
"details": "This module enables sites to block access for the administrative user account (user 1) or users with the administrator role.\n\nThe module does not sufficiently enforce these access restrictions across all supported authentication mechanisms. As a result, a blocked administrative user may still be able to authenticate through certain alternative authentication methods.\n\nThis vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must possess valid credentials for a user with the administrator role, and must authenticate using a less commonly used authentication mechanism.",
"id": "DRUPAL-CONTRIB-2026-183",
"modified": "2026-09-23T17:11:27.000Z",
"published": "2026-09-23T17:11:27.000Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2026-183"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.