(CVE-2025-8361)
Vulnerability from drupal – Published: 2025-07-30 16:30 – Updated: 2025-07-30 16:30 – Source website
VLAI
Details
This module enables you to access an edit page for a config page.
The module doesn't sufficiently check the access permissions (hook_ENTITY_TYPE_access() wasn't taken into account).
This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must have a role with the permission "edit ID config page" and that it only affects sites that have access restricted via the hook_ENTITY_TYPE_access() hook.
Credits
References
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"affected_versions": "\u003c2.18.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist:https://packages.drupal.org/8",
"name": "drupal/config_pages"
},
"ranges": [
{
"database_specific": {
"constraint": "\u003c2.18.0"
},
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"severity": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8361"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://www.drupal.org/u/prudloff"
],
"name": "Pierre Rudloff (prudloff)"
}
],
"details": "This module enables you to access an edit page for a config page.\n\nThe module doesn\u0027t sufficiently check the access permissions (`hook_ENTITY_TYPE_access()` wasn\u0027t taken into account).\n\nThis vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must have a role with the permission \"edit ID config page\" and that it only affects sites that have access restricted via the `hook_ENTITY_TYPE_access()` hook.",
"id": "DRUPAL-CONTRIB-2025-093",
"modified": "2025-07-30T16:30:44.000Z",
"published": "2025-07-30T16:30:44.000Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2025-093"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…