(CVE-2025-31676)
Vulnerability from drupal – Published: 2025-01-08 17:22 – Updated: 2025-06-19 22:05 – Source websiteThis module enables you to do Two-Factor Authentication by email, using a user registered email to send a verification code to the user's email every time the user tries to log in to your site.
The module did not sufficiently protect against brute force attacks, allowing an attacker to bypass the second factor.
This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact the attacker must be able to present the username and first factor (i.e. password).
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"affected_versions": "\u003e=2.0.0 \u003c2.0.3",
"patched": true
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist:https://packages.drupal.org/8",
"name": "drupal/email_tfa"
},
"ranges": [
{
"database_specific": {
"constraint": "\u003e=2.0.0 \u003c2.0.3"
},
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"severity": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31676"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://www.drupal.org/user/679260"
],
"name": "Ursin Cola"
}
],
"details": "This module enables you to do Two-Factor Authentication by email, using a user registered email to send a verification code to the user\u0027s email every time the user tries to log in to your site.\n\nThe module did not sufficiently protect against brute force attacks, allowing an attacker to bypass the second factor.\n\nThis vulnerability is mitigated by the fact the attacker must be able to present the username and first factor (i.e. password).",
"id": "DRUPAL-CONTRIB-2025-001",
"modified": "2025-06-19T22:05:09.000Z",
"published": "2025-01-08T17:22:11.000Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2025-001"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.