CVE-2026-31554 (GCVE-0-2026-31554)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 14:35 – Updated: 2026-04-24 14:35
VLAI?
Title
futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags
Nicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF
when sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial
motivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex,
but since that hasn't been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are
identical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue
operations.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff , < 027145ace09fad4c7cbcd6c61fe9b429c63eb0e5
(git)
Affected: 0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff , < 18b7d09c2b794c71d4252f3ea2cf84ad12b73d6a (git) Affected: 0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff , < e2f78c7ec1655fedd945366151ba54fcb9580508 (git) Affected: 0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff , < 19f94b39058681dec64a10ebeb6f23fe7fc3f77a (git) |
||
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/futex/syscalls.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "027145ace09fad4c7cbcd6c61fe9b429c63eb0e5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "18b7d09c2b794c71d4252f3ea2cf84ad12b73d6a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e2f78c7ec1655fedd945366151ba54fcb9580508",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "19f94b39058681dec64a10ebeb6f23fe7fc3f77a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0f4b5f972216782a4acb1ae00dcb55173847c2ff",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/futex/syscalls.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.7"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.7",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.80",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.21",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19.11",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.80",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfutex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags\n\nNicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF\nwhen sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial\nmotivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex,\nbut since that hasn\u0027t been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are\nidentical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue\noperations."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T14:35:38.527Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/027145ace09fad4c7cbcd6c61fe9b429c63eb0e5"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18b7d09c2b794c71d4252f3ea2cf84ad12b73d6a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2f78c7ec1655fedd945366151ba54fcb9580508"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19f94b39058681dec64a10ebeb6f23fe7fc3f77a"
}
],
"title": "futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-31554",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T14:35:38.527Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-09T15:48:24.115Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T14:35:38.527Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-31554",
"date": "2026-04-25",
"epss": "0.00018",
"percentile": "0.04621"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-31554\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2026-04-24T15:16:29.730\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-24T17:51:40.810\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nfutex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags\\n\\nNicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF\\nwhen sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial\\nmotivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex,\\nbut since that hasn\u0027t been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are\\nidentical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue\\noperations.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/027145ace09fad4c7cbcd6c61fe9b429c63eb0e5\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18b7d09c2b794c71d4252f3ea2cf84ad12b73d6a\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19f94b39058681dec64a10ebeb6f23fe7fc3f77a\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2f78c7ec1655fedd945366151ba54fcb9580508\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…