CVE-2026-26973 (GCVE-0-2026-26973)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-26 19:19 – Updated: 2026-02-26 20:41
VLAI?
Title
Discourse doesn't scope reviewable notes to user-visible reviewables
Summary
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 have an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) in `ReviewableNotesController`. When `enable_category_group_moderation` is enabled, a user belonging to a category moderation group can create or delete their own notes on **any** reviewable in the system, including reviewables in categories they do not moderate. The controller used an unscoped `Reviewable.find` and the `ensure_can_see` guard only checked whether the user could access the review queue in general, not whether they could access the specific reviewable. Only instances with `enable_category_group_moderation` enabled are affected. Staff users (admins/moderators) are not impacted as they already have access to all reviewables. The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by scoping the reviewable lookup through `Reviewable.viewable_by(current_user)`. As a workaround, disable the `enable_category_group_moderation` site setting. This removes the attack surface as only staff users will have access to the review queue.
CWE
  • CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
discourse discourse Affected: < 2025.12.2
Affected: >= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1
Affected: >= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-26973",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-26T20:40:10.083850Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T20:41:30.698Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "discourse",
          "vendor": "discourse",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2025.12.2"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2026.1.0-latest, \u003c 2026.1.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2026.2.0-latest, \u003c 2026.2.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 have an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) in `ReviewableNotesController`. When `enable_category_group_moderation` is enabled, a user belonging to a  category moderation group can create or delete their own notes on **any** reviewable in the system, including reviewables in categories they do not moderate. The controller used an unscoped `Reviewable.find` and the `ensure_can_see` guard only checked whether the user could access the review queue in general, not whether they could access the specific reviewable. Only instances with `enable_category_group_moderation` enabled are affected. Staff users (admins/moderators) are not impacted as they already have access to all reviewables. The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by scoping the reviewable lookup through `Reviewable.viewable_by(current_user)`. As a workaround, disable the `enable_category_group_moderation` site setting. This removes the attack surface as only staff users will have access to the review queue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T19:20:35.711Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-c587-qx78-vhmx",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-c587-qx78-vhmx"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-c587-qx78-vhmx",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Discourse doesn\u0027t scope reviewable notes to user-visible reviewables"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-26973",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-26T19:19:18.139Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-16T22:20:28.612Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T20:41:30.698Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-26973\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-02-26T20:31:37.327\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-02-27T14:06:37.987\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 have an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) in `ReviewableNotesController`. When `enable_category_group_moderation` is enabled, a user belonging to a  category moderation group can create or delete their own notes on **any** reviewable in the system, including reviewables in categories they do not moderate. The controller used an unscoped `Reviewable.find` and the `ensure_can_see` guard only checked whether the user could access the review queue in general, not whether they could access the specific reviewable. Only instances with `enable_category_group_moderation` enabled are affected. Staff users (admins/moderators) are not impacted as they already have access to all reviewables. The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by scoping the reviewable lookup through `Reviewable.viewable_by(current_user)`. As a workaround, disable the `enable_category_group_moderation` site setting. This removes the attack surface as only staff users will have access to the review queue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Discourse es una plataforma de discusi\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo abierto. Versiones anteriores a 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1 y 2026.2.0 tienen una IDOR (Referencia Directa Insegura a Objeto) en `ReviewableNotesController`. Cuando `enable_category_group_moderation` est\u00e1 habilitado, un usuario que pertenece a un grupo de moderaci\u00f3n de categor\u00eda puede crear o eliminar sus propias notas en cualquier elemento revisable del sistema, incluyendo elementos revisables en categor\u00edas que no modera. El controlador us\u00f3 un `Reviewable.find` sin \u00e1mbito y la protecci\u00f3n `ensure_can_see` solo verificaba si el usuario pod\u00eda acceder a la cola de revisi\u00f3n en general, no si pod\u00eda acceder al elemento revisable espec\u00edfico. Solo las instancias con `enable_category_group_moderation` habilitado se ven afectadas. Los usuarios del personal (administradores/moderadores) no se ven afectados ya que ya tienen acceso a todos los elementos revisables. El problema est\u00e1 parcheado en las versiones 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1 y 2026.2.0 al limitar la b\u00fasqueda de elementos revisables a trav\u00e9s de `Reviewable.viewable_by(current_user)`. Como soluci\u00f3n alternativa, deshabilite la configuraci\u00f3n del sitio `enable_category_group_moderation`. Esto elimina la superficie de ataque ya que solo los usuarios del personal tendr\u00e1n acceso a la cola de revisi\u00f3n.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-c587-qx78-vhmx\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…