CVE-2024-31205 (GCVE-0-2024-31205)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-08 14:26 – Updated: 2024-08-02 01:46
VLAI?
Title
Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation
Summary
Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.
Severity ?
4.2 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
saleor saleor Affected: >= 3.10.0, < 3.14.64
Affected: >= 3.15.0, < 3.15.39
Affected: >= 3.16.0, < 3.16.39
Affected: >= 3.17.0, < 3.17.35
Affected: >= 3.18.0, < 3.18.31
Affected: >= 3.19.0, < 3.19.19
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-31205",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-04-09T15:46:25.741486Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T17:37:18.826Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T01:46:04.600Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "saleor",
          "vendor": "saleor",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.10.0, \u003c 3.14.64"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.15.0, \u003c 3.15.39"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.16.0, \u003c 3.16.39"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.17.0, \u003c 3.17.35"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.18.0, \u003c 3.18.31"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 3.19.0, \u003c 3.19.19"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.\n"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.2,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-352",
              "description": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-04-08T14:26:30.971Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-31205",
    "datePublished": "2024-04-08T14:26:30.971Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-03-29T14:16:31.899Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T01:46:04.600Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-31205\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-04-08T15:15:08.023\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-01-07T20:05:30.017\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.\\n\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Saleor es una plataforma de comercio electr\u00f3nico. A partir de la versi\u00f3n 3.10.0 y anteriores a las versiones 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31 y 3.19.19, un atacante puede omitir la validaci\u00f3n de cross-set request forgery (CSRF) al llamar. actualizar la mutaci\u00f3n del token con una cadena vac\u00eda. Cuando un usuario proporciona una cadena vac\u00eda en la mutaci\u00f3n `refreshToken`, mientras el token persiste en la cookie `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME`, la aplicaci\u00f3n omite la validaci\u00f3n contra el token CSRF y devuelve un token de acceso v\u00e1lido. Las versiones 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31 y 3.19.19 contienen un parche para el problema. Como workaround, se puede reemplazar `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. Esto solucionar\u00e1 el problema, pero tenga en cuenta que devuelve `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` en lugar de `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.2,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":2.5},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.10.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.14.64\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6AA9F9AF-E3A8-4D19-AC63-AB1F2115906F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.15.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.15.39\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A592CB29-C622-4DCF-AD16-E6B103899F8A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.16.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.16.39\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"485BC5CE-2874-42E2-BFD9-5529046ED09B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.17.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.17.35\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7D126A50-1C0D-4389-9316-9EC6BFAFFA95\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.18.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.18.31\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"895CE01A-B60F-473F-9208-A36CAD6FA818\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:saleor:saleor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.19.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.19.19\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C995842D-3835-4EAE-9C86-E0EF95A4716E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-352\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 4.2, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/security/advisories/GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/saleor/saleor/commit/36699c6f5c99590d24f46e3d5c5b1a3c2fd072e7\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"saleor\", \"product\": \"saleor\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.10.0, \u003c 3.14.64\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.15.0, \u003c 3.15.39\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.16.0, \u003c 3.16.39\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.17.0, \u003c 3.17.35\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.18.0, \u003c 3.18.31\", \"status\": \"affected\"}, {\"version\": \"\u003e= 3.19.0, \u003c 3.19.19\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-04-08T14:26:30.971Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.\\n\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-ff69-fwjf-3c9w\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-31205\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-04-09T15:46:25.741486Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-05-23T19:01:22.643Z\"}, \"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\"}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-31205\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-03-29T14:16:31.899Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-04-08T14:26:30.971Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-06-04T17:37:18.826Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.