CVE-2016-9122 (GCVE-0-2016-9122)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-03-28 02:46 – Updated: 2024-08-06 02:42
VLAI?
Summary
go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • Cryptographic Issue
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4 Affected: Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:42:10.637Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-03-27T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Cryptographic Issue",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-03-28T02:57:01",
        "orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
        "shortName": "hackerone"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-9122",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Cryptographic Issue"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
    "assignerShortName": "hackerone",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-9122",
    "datePublished": "2017-03-28T02:46:00",
    "dateReserved": "2016-10-31T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:42:10.637Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-9122\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"published\":\"2017-03-28T02:59:00.260\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"go-jose en versiones anteriores a 1.0.4 sufre de la explotaci\u00f3n de m\u00faltiples firmas. La librer\u00eda go-jose soporta mensajes con varias firmas. Sin embargo, al validar un mensaje firmado el API no indic\u00f3 qu\u00e9 firma era v\u00e1lida, lo que podr\u00eda conducir a confusi\u00f3n. Por ejemplo, los usuarios de la biblioteca pueden leer de forma err\u00f3nea valores de cabecera protegidos de una firma adjunta que era diferente de la validada originalmente.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-284\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:go-jose_project:go-jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.0.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"461700A0-1ABE-4A30-9C79-80C835D8B62E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://hackerone.com/reports/169629\",\"source\":\"support@hackerone.com\",\"tags\":[\"Permissions Required\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://hackerone.com/reports/169629\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Permissions Required\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.