CVE-2012-3405 (GCVE-0-2012-3405)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2014-02-10 17:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 20:05
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.14 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a format string with a large number of format specifiers that triggers "desynchronization within the buffer size handling," a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3404.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833704 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13446 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_GENTOO |
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTU |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/0… | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
Date Public
2011-12-18 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.277Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "RHSA-2012:1200",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833704"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13446"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-201503-04",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2012:1098",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html"
},
{
"name": "USN-1589-1",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_UBUNTU",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20120711 Re: CVE request: glibc formatted printing vulnerabilities",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2011-12-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.14 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a format string with a large number of format specifiers that triggers \"desynchronization within the buffer size handling,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3404."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-06-30T16:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "RHSA-2012:1200",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833704"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13446"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-201503-04",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2012:1098",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html"
},
{
"name": "USN-1589-1",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_UBUNTU"
],
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20120711 Re: CVE request: glibc formatted printing vulnerabilities",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2012-3405",
"datePublished": "2014-02-10T17:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T20:05:12.277Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2012-3405",
"date": "2026-09-20",
"epss": "0.02087",
"percentile": "0.80741"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:2.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BFD5D113-EF53-4690-92AC-B6E54D70AA9B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:enterprise_virtualization:3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "105130E9-D48E-4FB8-A715-E6438EC7E744",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:8.04:-:lts:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D6DFE2D3-46E2-4D0C-8508-30307D654560",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:10.04:-:lts:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7118F616-25CA-4E34-AA13-4D14BB62419F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:11.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EF49D26F-142E-468B-87C1-BABEA445255C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:11.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E4174F4F-149E-41A6-BBCC-D01114C05F38",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:12.04:-:lts:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F5D324C4-97C7-49D3-A809-9EAD4B690C69",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2F6AB192-9D7D-4A9A-8995-E53A9DE9EAFC",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The vfprintf function in stdio-common/vfprintf.c in libc in GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.14 and other versions does not properly calculate a buffer length, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism and cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) via a format string with a large number of format specifiers that triggers \"desynchronization within the buffer size handling,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3404."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La funci\u00f3n vfprintf en stdio-common/vfprintf.c en libc en GNU C Library (tambi\u00e9n conocido como glibc) 2.14 y otras versiones no calcula correctamente una longitud de buffer, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto evadir el mecanismo de protecci\u00f3n de cadenas de formato FORTIFY_SOURCE y causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (fallo de segmentaci\u00f3n y ca\u00edda) a trav\u00e9s de una cadena de formato con un gran n\u00famero de especificadores de formato que provoca \"desincronizaci\u00f3n dentro del manejo del tama\u00f1o de buffer,\" una vulnerabilidad deferente a CVE-2012-3404."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-3405",
"lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2014-02-10T18:15:10.073",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833704"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13446"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1098.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1200.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/11/17"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1589-1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833704"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503-04"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13446"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-189"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-27T13:44:51+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2012-3405",
"id": "CVE-2012-3405",
"initial_release_date": "2012-07-11T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "129",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "glibc: incorrect use of extend_alloca() in formatted printing can lead to FORTIFY_SOURCE format string protection bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2012/cve-2012-3405.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…