CVE-2005-2355 (GCVE-0-2005-2355)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2005-07-25 04:00 – Updated: 2005-11-02 10:00
VLAI?
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2335, CVE-2005-2356. Reason: due to a typo in an advisory, this candidate was accidentally referenced. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-2335 and CVE-2005-2356 to determine the appropriate identifier for the issue
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2005-11-02T10:00:00",
"orgId": "79363d38-fa19-49d1-9214-5f28da3f3ac5",
"shortName": "debian"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2335, CVE-2005-2356. Reason: due to a typo in an advisory, this candidate was accidentally referenced. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-2335 and CVE-2005-2356 to determine the appropriate identifier for the issue"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "79363d38-fa19-49d1-9214-5f28da3f3ac5",
"assignerShortName": "debian",
"cveId": "CVE-2005-2355",
"datePublished": "2005-07-25T04:00:00",
"dateRejected": "2005-11-02T10:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2005-07-22T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2005-11-02T10:00:00",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2005-2355\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@debian.org\",\"published\":\"2005-07-25T04:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T01:57:36.537\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2335, CVE-2005-2356. Reason: due to a typo in an advisory, this candidate was accidentally referenced. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2005-2335 and CVE-2005-2356 to determine the appropriate identifier for the issue\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…