CNVD-2018-20073

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2018-09-28
VLAI Severity ?
Title
MCMS跨站请求伪造漏洞
Description
MCMS是一款基于Spring、SpringMVC、Mybatis的Java快速开发平台。 MCMS 4.6.5版本中的ms/basic/manager/save.do文件存在跨站请求伪造漏洞,远程攻击者可利用该漏洞添加管理员账户。
Severity
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: http://ms.mingsoft.net/

Reference
https://gitee.com/mingSoft/MCMS/issues/IM1DA
Impacted products
Name
铭飞科技有限公司 MCMS 4.6.5
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2018-17366"
    }
  },
  "description": "MCMS\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u57fa\u4e8eSpring\u3001SpringMVC\u3001Mybatis\u7684Java\u5feb\u901f\u5f00\u53d1\u5e73\u53f0\u3002\r\n\r\nMCMS 4.6.5\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u7684ms/basic/manager/save.do\u6587\u4ef6\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6dfb\u52a0\u7ba1\u7406\u5458\u8d26\u6237\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Devote",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://ms.mingsoft.net/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2018-20073",
  "openTime": "2018-09-28",
  "products": {
    "product": "\u94ed\u98de\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8 MCMS 4.6.5"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://gitee.com/mingSoft/MCMS/issues/IM1DA",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2018-09-26",
  "title": "MCMS\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…