Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2017-26600

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2017-09-13

Title

CompuLab Intense PC输入验证漏洞

Description

CompuLab Intense PC是以色列CompuLab公司的一款迷你型PC设备。使用cr_2.2.0.400.2版本固件的CompuLab Intense PC中存在安全漏洞，该漏洞源于Phoenix SecureCore UEFI固件未能执行capsule签名验证。攻击者可利用该漏洞读取和写入任意的系统固件。

Severity

高

Patch Name

CompuLab Intense PC输入验证漏洞的补丁

Patch Description

Formal description

目前厂商已发布升级补丁以修复漏洞，详情请关注厂商主页： http://www.compulab.com/

Reference

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9457

Impacted products

Name
CompuLab Intense PC <=cr_2.2.0.400.2

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-9457"
    }
  },
  "description": "CompuLab Intense PC\u662f\u4ee5\u8272\u5217CompuLab\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u8ff7\u4f60\u578bPC\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\n\u4f7f\u7528cr_2.2.0.400.2\u7248\u672c\u56fa\u4ef6\u7684CompuLab Intense PC\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8ePhoenix SecureCore UEFI\u56fa\u4ef6\u672a\u80fd\u6267\u884ccapsule\u7b7e\u540d\u9a8c\u8bc1\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u8bfb\u53d6\u548c\u5199\u5165\u4efb\u610f\u7684\u7cfb\u7edf\u56fa\u4ef6\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be6\u60c5\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.compulab.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-26600",
  "openTime": "2017-09-13",
  "patchDescription": "CompuLab Intense PC\u662f\u4ee5\u8272\u5217CompuLab\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u8ff7\u4f60\u578bPC\u8bbe\u5907\u3002\r\n\r\n\u4f7f\u7528cr_2.2.0.400.2\u7248\u672c\u56fa\u4ef6\u7684CompuLab Intense PC\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8ePhoenix SecureCore UEFI\u56fa\u4ef6\u672a\u80fd\u6267\u884ccapsule\u7b7e\u540d\u9a8c\u8bc1\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u8bfb\u53d6\u548c\u5199\u5165\u4efb\u610f\u7684\u7cfb\u7edf\u56fa\u4ef6\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "CompuLab Intense PC\u8f93\u5165\u9a8c\u8bc1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "CompuLab Intense PC \u003c=cr_2.2.0.400.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9457",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2017-07-26",
  "title": "CompuLab Intense PC\u8f93\u5165\u9a8c\u8bc1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2017-9457 (GCVE-0-2017-9457)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-07-25 14:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 17:11

Summary

Intense PC Phoenix SecureCore UEFI firmware does not perform capsule signature validation before upgrading the system firmware. The absence of signature validation allows an attacker with administrator privileges to flash a modified UEFI BIOS.

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

Assigner

mitre CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard E 29/100 over 2164 records in the last 180 days details

References

3 references

URL	Tags
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/56	mailing-listx_refsource_FULLDISC
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143481/Compu…	x_refsource_MISC
https://watchmysys.com/blog/2017/07/cve-2017-9457…	x_refsource_MISC

Date Public

2017-07-25 00:00

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T17:11:01.236Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20170724 CVE-2017-9457 CompuLab Intense PC lacks firmware signature validation",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/56"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143481/Compulab-Intense-PC-MintBox-2-Signature-Verification.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://watchmysys.com/blog/2017/07/cve-2017-9457-compulab-intense-pc-lacks-firmware-validation/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-07-25T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Intense PC Phoenix SecureCore UEFI firmware does not perform capsule signature validation before upgrading the system firmware. The absence of signature validation allows an attacker with administrator privileges to flash a modified UEFI BIOS."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-15T11:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20170724 CVE-2017-9457 CompuLab Intense PC lacks firmware signature validation",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/56"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143481/Compulab-Intense-PC-MintBox-2-Signature-Verification.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://watchmysys.com/blog/2017/07/cve-2017-9457-compulab-intense-pc-lacks-firmware-validation/"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-9457",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Intense PC Phoenix SecureCore UEFI firmware does not perform capsule signature validation before upgrading the system firmware. The absence of signature validation allows an attacker with administrator privileges to flash a modified UEFI BIOS."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20170724 CVE-2017-9457 CompuLab Intense PC lacks firmware signature validation",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jul/56"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143481/Compulab-Intense-PC-MintBox-2-Signature-Verification.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143481/Compulab-Intense-PC-MintBox-2-Signature-Verification.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://watchmysys.com/blog/2017/07/cve-2017-9457-compulab-intense-pc-lacks-firmware-validation/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://watchmysys.com/blog/2017/07/cve-2017-9457-compulab-intense-pc-lacks-firmware-validation/"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-9457",
    "datePublished": "2017-07-25T14:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2017-06-06T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T17:11:01.236Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted