CNVD-2015-05875

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-09-09
VLAI Severity ?
Title
OkCupid OKWS跨站脚本漏洞
Description
OkCupid OKWS(OK Web Server)是一款用于创建Web服务的Web服务器。 OkCupid OKWS的libahttp/err.c文件中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于non-existent页面没未能充分过滤‘PATH_INFO’值。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞注入任意Web脚本或HTML。
Severity
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案: http://www.okcupid.com

Reference
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/128338/OKCupid-Cross-Site-Scripting.html
Impacted products
Name
okcupid.com OK Web Server
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-3148"
    }
  },
  "description": "OkCupid OKWS\uff08OK Web Server\uff09\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u521b\u5efaWeb\u670d\u52a1\u7684Web\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002\r\n\r\nOkCupid OKWS\u7684libahttp/err.c\u6587\u4ef6\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8enon-existent\u9875\u9762\u6ca1\u672a\u80fd\u5145\u5206\u8fc7\u6ee4\u2018PATH_INFO\u2019\u503c\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6ce8\u5165\u4efb\u610fWeb\u811a\u672c\u6216HTML\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Kenneth F. Belva",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.okcupid.com",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-05875",
  "openTime": "2015-09-09",
  "products": {
    "product": "okcupid.com OK Web Server"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/128338/OKCupid-Cross-Site-Scripting.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-09-06",
  "title": "OkCupid OKWS\u8de8\u7ad9\u811a\u672c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…