CNVD-2015-03341

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-05-26
VLAI Severity ?
Title
Infilink HMI存在未明远程拒绝服务漏洞
Description
Kessler-Ellis是著名仪器仪表厂商。Infilink HMI是Kessler-Ellis产品的人机接口(HMI)。 Infilink HMI存在未明安全漏洞，允许远程攻击者利用漏洞提交特殊请求，使应用程序崩溃。
Severity
中
Formal description

目前没有详细解决方案提供： http://www.kep.com/productPages/Infilink-HMI/Infilink-HMI-software.html

Reference
http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/122212
Impacted products
Name
Kessler-Ellis Infilink HMI
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "description": "Kessler-Ellis\u662f\u8457\u540d\u4eea\u5668\u4eea\u8868\u5382\u5546\u3002Infilink HMI\u662fKessler-Ellis\u4ea7\u54c1\u7684\u4eba\u673a\u63a5\u53e3(HMI)\u3002\r\n\r\nInfilink HMI\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u4ea4\u7279\u6b8a\u8bf7\u6c42\uff0c\u4f7f\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
  "discovererName": "GLEG - GLEG, Ltd.",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://www.kep.com/productPages/Infilink-HMI/Infilink-HMI-software.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-03341",
  "openTime": "2015-05-26",
  "products": {
    "product": "Kessler-Ellis Infilink HMI"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/122212",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-05-20",
  "title": "Infilink HMI\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u8fdc\u7a0b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.