CERTA-2012-AVI-665
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2012-11-20 - Updated: 2012-11-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans IBM Business Process Manager. Elles permettent à un attaquant d'injecter du code indirecte à distance (XSS).
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
NoneImpacted products
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "IBM Business Process Manager version 8.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "IBM Business Process Manager version 8.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [],
"initial_release_date": "2012-11-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2012-11-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-665",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2012-11-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eIBM Business Process Manager\u003c/span\u003e. Elles permettent \u00e0\nun attaquant d\u0027injecter du code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS).\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans IBM Business Process Manager",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg27036594 du 16 novembre 2012",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27036594"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…