CERTA-2011-AVI-544

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2011-09-30 - Updated: 2011-09-30

De multiples vulnérabilités dans la fonction NAT de CISCO IOS peuvent provoquer des dénis de service à distance.

Description

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans CISCO IOS. Ces vulnérabilités concernent la fonction de traduction d'adresse réseau (NAT) pour les protocoles LDAP, SIP et H323. L'exploitation de ces vulnérabilités, par l'envoi de paquets réseaux spécialement conçus, peut provoquer le redémarrage de l'équipement ou son blocage.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco IOS CISCO IOS versions 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 15.0 et 15.1 ;
Cisco IOS XE CISCO IOS XE.
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "CISCO IOS versions 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 15.0 et 15.1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "IOS",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "CISCO IOS XE.",
      "product": {
        "name": "IOS XE",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDe multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans CISCO IOS. Ces\nvuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s concernent la fonction de traduction d\u0027adresse r\u00e9seau\n(NAT) pour les protocoles LDAP, SIP et H323. L\u0027exploitation de ces\nvuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s, par l\u0027envoi de paquets r\u00e9seaux sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7us, peut\nprovoquer le red\u00e9marrage de l\u0027\u00e9quipement ou son blocage.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-3279",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3279"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-3277",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3277"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-3280",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3280"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-0946",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-0946"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2011-3276",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3276"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2011-09-30T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2011-09-30T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20110928-nat du 28 septembre    2011 :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20110928-nat.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-544",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-09-30T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans la fonction NAT de CISCO IOS peuvent\nprovoquer des d\u00e9nis de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans la fonction NAT de CISCO IOS",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20110928-nat du 28 septembre 2011",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.