CERTA-2010-AVI-210

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2010-05-14 - Updated: 2010-05-14

De multiples vulnérabilités dans Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch permettent de réaliser un déni de service à distance.

Description

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans la gestion des messages Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) et Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) par Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch. L'exploitation de ces vulnérabilités permet de réaliser un déni de service à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch.

Se référer au bulletin de l'éditeur pour connaître le détail des versions vulnérables.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003e\u003cSPAN class=\"textit\"\u003eCisco PGW 2200 Softswitch\u003c/SPAN\u003e.\u003c/P\u003e  \u003cP\u003eSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour conna\u00eetre le d\u00e9tail  des versions vuln\u00e9rables.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nDe multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans la gestion des\nmessages Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) et Media Gateway Control\nProtocol (MGCP) par Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch. L\u0027exploitation de ces\nvuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permet de r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-0603",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0603"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-1562",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1562"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-0602",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0602"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-1567",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1567"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-1561",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1561"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-0604",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0604"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-1563",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1563"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-1565",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-1565"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-0601",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-0601"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2010-05-14T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2010-05-14T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco 20100512-pgw du 12 mai 2010 :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100512-pgw.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2010-AVI-210",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2010-05-14T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eCisco PGW 2200\nSoftswitch\u003c/span\u003e permettent de r\u00e9aliser un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Cisco PGW Softswitch",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 cisco-sa-20100512-pgw du 12 mai 2010",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…