CERTA-2009-AVI-497
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-11-12 - Updated: 2009-11-12
Deux vulnérabilités dans McAfee IntruShield NSM (Network Security Manager) permettent à un utilisateur malveillant de réaliser du vol de session ou de l'injection de code indirecte.
Description
Une première vulnérabilité provient de la création du cookie d'authentification utilisé par McAfee IntruShield NSM. Elle est exploitable par un utilisateur malveillant pour voler une session.
Une deuxième vulnérabilité réside dans le manque de validation des entrées par la console d'administration de McAfee IntruShield NSM. Elle est exploitable par un utilisateur malveillant pour réaliser de l'injection de code indirecte à l'encontre des administrateurs.
Solution
Se référer aux bulletins de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
McAfee IntruShield NSM 5.1.x.
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cSPAN class=\"textit\"\u003eMcAfee IntruShield NSM\u003c/SPAN\u003e 5.1.x.",
"content": "## Description\n\nUne premi\u00e8re vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 provient de la cr\u00e9ation du cookie\nd\u0027authentification utilis\u00e9 par McAfee IntruShield NSM. Elle est\nexploitable par un utilisateur malveillant pour voler une session.\n\nUne deuxi\u00e8me vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 r\u00e9side dans le manque de validation des\nentr\u00e9es par la console d\u0027administration de McAfee IntruShield NSM. Elle\nest exploitable par un utilisateur malveillant pour r\u00e9aliser de\nl\u0027injection de code indirecte \u00e0 l\u0027encontre des administrateurs.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer aux bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2009-3566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2009-3565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3565"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2009-11-12T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2009-11-12T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 McAfee SB10004 et SB10005 du 06 novembre 2009 :",
"url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10005"
},
{
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 McAfee SB10004 et SB10005 du 06 novembre 2009 :",
"url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10004"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-497",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2009-11-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
}
],
"summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eMcAfee IntruShield\nNSM\u003c/span\u003e (Network Security Manager) permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur\nmalveillant de r\u00e9aliser du vol de session ou de l\u0027injection de code\nindirecte.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans McAfee Network Security Manager",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 McAfee SB10004 et SB10005 du 06 novembre 2009",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.