CERTA-2009-AVI-189

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-05-14 - Updated: 2009-05-14

Deux vulnérabilités dans Drupal permettent de réaliser des injections de code indirectes.

Description

Deux vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Drupal :

  • la vulnérabilité décrite dans l'avis CERTA-2009-AVI-175 concernant l'utilisation de caractères particuliers en UTF-8 n'était pas suffisamment bien corrigée ;
  • une faille dans le module taxonomy permet à un utilisateur disposant de droits spécifiques (administer taxonomy) de réaliser des injections de code indirectes.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Drupal Drupal Drupal versions 6.11 et antérieures.
Drupal Drupal Drupal versions 5.17 et antérieures ;

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Drupal versions 6.11 et ant\u00e9rieures.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Drupal",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Drupal",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Drupal versions 5.17 et ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Drupal",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Drupal",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nDeux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans Drupal :\n\n-   la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9crite dans l\u0027avis CERTA-2009-AVI-175 concernant\n    l\u0027utilisation de caract\u00e8res particuliers en UTF-8 n\u0027\u00e9tait pas\n    suffisamment bien corrig\u00e9e ;\n-   une faille dans le module taxonomy permet \u00e0 un utilisateur disposant\n    de droits sp\u00e9cifiques (administer taxonomy) de r\u00e9aliser des\n    injections de code indirectes.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [],
  "initial_release_date": "2009-05-14T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2009-05-14T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SA-CORE-2009-006 du 13 mai 2009 :",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/461886"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-189",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2009-05-14T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eDrupal\u003c/span\u003e permettent\nde r\u00e9aliser des injections de code indirectes.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Drupal",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Drupal SA-CORE-2009-006 du 13 mai 2009",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…