CERTA-2009-AVI-028
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2009-01-22 - Updated: 2009-01-22
Une vulnérabilité dans Cisco Security Manager permet d'accéder à distance au service IPS Event Viewer.
Description
Cisco IPS Event Viewer (IEV) est un service de Cisco Security Manager (CSM) qui permet de visualiser et gérer les alertes de sécurité de cinq capteurs maximum. L'accès à ce service permet de configurer les filtres, d'importer et d'exporter des journaux, etc.
IEV est installé par défaut dans Cisco Security Manager mais n'est pas automatiquement démarré. Lorsqu'IEV est démarré, de nombreux ports TCP sont ouverts à la fois sur le serveur et sur le client. Lorsque le client IEV arrête sa session, les ports TCP du client sont fermés, mais pas ceux du serveur. En se connectant directement à un des ports TCP serveur, un utilisateur malintentionné peut obtenir un accès administrateur au service IEV et à sa base de données.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Cisco Security Manager versions 3.2.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.2.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cisco Security Manager versions 3.1.x ;",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Cisco",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Description\n\nCisco IPS Event Viewer (IEV) est un service de Cisco Security Manager\n(CSM) qui permet de visualiser et g\u00e9rer les alertes de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de cinq\ncapteurs maximum. L\u0027acc\u00e8s \u00e0 ce service permet de configurer les filtres,\nd\u0027importer et d\u0027exporter des journaux, etc.\n\nIEV est install\u00e9 par d\u00e9faut dans Cisco Security Manager mais n\u0027est pas\nautomatiquement d\u00e9marr\u00e9. Lorsqu\u0027IEV est d\u00e9marr\u00e9, de nombreux ports TCP\nsont ouverts \u00e0 la fois sur le serveur et sur le client. Lorsque le\nclient IEV arr\u00eate sa session, les ports TCP du client sont ferm\u00e9s, mais\npas ceux du serveur. En se connectant directement \u00e0 un des ports TCP\nserveur, un utilisateur malintentionn\u00e9 peut obtenir un acc\u00e8s\nadministrateur au service IEV et \u00e0 sa base de donn\u00e9es.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2008-3820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-3820"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2009-01-22T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2009-01-22T00:00:00",
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco cisco-sa-20090121-csm du 21 janvier 2009 :",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090121-csm.shtml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2009-AVI-028",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2009-01-22T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Acc\u00e8s \u00e0 distance \u00e0 un service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eCisco Security\nManager\u003c/span\u003e permet d\u0027acc\u00e9der \u00e0 distance au service \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eIPS Event Viewer\u003c/span\u003e.\n",
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Cisco Security Manager",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco cisco-sa-20090121-csm du 21 janvier 2009",
"url": null
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.