CERTA-2008-AVI-253

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2008-05-19 - Updated: 2008-05-19

Une vulnérabilité dans les produits Cisco de type CSM et CSM-S permet à un utilisateur distant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Description

Une vulnérabilité de type « fuite mémoire » est présente dans les extensions Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x et leur version supportant le SSL : CSM-S. Cette vulnérabilité permet à un utilisateur distant de provoquer une consommation excessive de la mémoire par l'équipement vulnérable via des paquets TCP particuliers.

L'exploitation de cette vulnérabilité nécessite que les équipements CSM ou CSM-S soient configurés en mode layer 7 load balancing.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco N/A Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x ;
Cisco N/A Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module with SSL (CSM-S) 2.x.
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module with SSL (CSM-S) 2.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type \u00ab fuite m\u00e9moire \u00bb est pr\u00e9sente dans les\nextensions Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x et leur\nversion supportant le SSL : CSM-S. Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permet \u00e0 un\nutilisateur distant de provoquer une consommation excessive de la\nm\u00e9moire par l\u0027\u00e9quipement vuln\u00e9rable via des paquets TCP particuliers.\n\nL\u0027exploitation de cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 n\u00e9cessite que les \u00e9quipements CSM\nou CSM-S soient configur\u00e9s en mode layer 7 load balancing.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-1749",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-1749"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco ID 105450 du 14 mai 2008 :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080514-csm.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-253",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits Cisco de type CSM et CSM-S permet \u00e0\nun utilisateur distant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits Cisco CSM",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco n\u00b0105450 du 14 mai 2008",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.