CERTA-2008-AVI-253

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2008-05-19 - Updated: 2008-05-19

Une vulnérabilité dans les produits Cisco de type CSM et CSM-S permet à un utilisateur distant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Description

Une vulnérabilité de type « fuite mémoire » est présente dans les extensions Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x et leur version supportant le SSL : CSM-S. Cette vulnérabilité permet à un utilisateur distant de provoquer une consommation excessive de la mémoire par l'équipement vulnérable via des paquets TCP particuliers.

L'exploitation de cette vulnérabilité nécessite que les équipements CSM ou CSM-S soient configurés en mode layer 7 load balancing.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Cisco N/A Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x ;
Cisco N/A Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module with SSL (CSM-S) 2.x.

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module with SSL (CSM-S) 2.x.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Cisco",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type \u00ab fuite m\u00e9moire \u00bb est pr\u00e9sente dans les\nextensions Cisco Catalyst Content Switching Module (CSM) 4.x et leur\nversion supportant le SSL : CSM-S. Cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 permet \u00e0 un\nutilisateur distant de provoquer une consommation excessive de la\nm\u00e9moire par l\u0027\u00e9quipement vuln\u00e9rable via des paquets TCP particuliers.\n\nL\u0027exploitation de cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 n\u00e9cessite que les \u00e9quipements CSM\nou CSM-S soient configur\u00e9s en mode layer 7 load balancing.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-1749",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-1749"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco ID 105450 du 14 mai 2008 :",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20080514-csm.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-253",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2008-05-19T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits Cisco de type CSM et CSM-S permet \u00e0\nun utilisateur distant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits Cisco CSM",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Cisco n\u00b0105450 du 14 mai 2008",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…