CERTA-2006-AVI-093

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2006-02-27 - Updated: 2006-02-27

None

Description

Un débordement de tampon dans le traitement des fichiers au format m3u et pls peut permettre à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

La version 5.2 de Winamp corrige cette vulnérabilité (cf. section Documentation).

Winamp version 5.13 et toutes les versions antérieures.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References
Site de l'éditeur Winamp None vendor-advisory

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eWinamp version 5.13 et toutes les versions ant\u00e9rieures.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nUn d\u00e9bordement de tampon dans le traitement des fichiers au format m3u\net pls peut permettre \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nLa version 5.2 de Winamp corrige cette vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 (cf. section\nDocumentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2006-0720",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-0720"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2006-02-27T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2006-02-27T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-093",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2006-02-27T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": null,
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Winamp",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Site de l\u0027\u00e9diteur Winamp",
      "url": "http://www.winamp.com"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…