CERTA-2005-AVI-510

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2005-12-29 - Updated: 2005-12-29

Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans l'application MailEnable permettent à un utilisateur mal intentionné de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Description

MailEnable est un serveur de messagerie.

Ces vulnérabilités sont dues à une erreur dans le traitement des arguments fournis aux commandes IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) suivantes : UID FETCH, LIST et LSUB. Un individu mal intentionné peut, au moyen d'arguments malicieusement constitués exécuter du code arbitraire à distance ou provoquer un déni de service.

Solution

Appliquer la mise à jour de sécurité ME-10010 disponible à l'adresse suivante :

http://www.mailenable.com/hotfix/ME-10010.EXE
None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
N/A N/A MailEnable Enterprise Edition 1.71 et versions antérieures ;
N/A N/A MailEnable Professional 1.1 et versions antérieures.

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "MailEnable Enterprise Edition 1.71 et versions ant\u00e9rieures ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "MailEnable Professional 1.1 et versions ant\u00e9rieures.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "N/A",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nMailEnable est un serveur de messagerie.\n\nCes vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s sont dues \u00e0 une erreur dans le traitement des\narguments fournis aux commandes IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol)\nsuivantes : UID FETCH, LIST et LSUB. Un individu mal intentionn\u00e9 peut,\nau moyen d\u0027arguments malicieusement constitu\u00e9s ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance ou provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service.\n\n## Solution\n\nAppliquer la mise \u00e0 jour de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ME-10010 disponible \u00e0 l\u0027adresse\nsuivante :\n\n    http://www.mailenable.com/hotfix/ME-10010.EXE\n",
  "cves": [],
  "initial_release_date": "2005-12-29T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2005-12-29T00:00:00",
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Information sur le Forum de discussion \u00ab Full-Disclosure \u00bb",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-December/040388.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Mise \u00e0 jour de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ME-10010 :",
      "url": "http://www.mailenable.com/hotfix/ME-10010.EXE"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2005-AVI-510",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2005-12-29T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans l\u0027application MailEnable permettent \u00e0 un\nutilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service ou\nd\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans MailEnable",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Forum de Discussion Full-Disclosure",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…