Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2025-02-04 07:21
Modified
2025-05-20 10:02
Summary
Local File Read via Path Traversal in mlflow/mlflow
Details
A path traversal vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository, specifically within the handling of the artifact_location parameter when creating an experiment. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by using a fragment component # in the artifact location URI to read arbitrary files on the server in the context of the server's process. This issue is similar to CVE-2023-6909 but utilizes a different component of the URI to achieve the same effect.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "mlflow",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/mlflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.3"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1594"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:lfprojects:mlflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "A path traversal vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository, specifically within the handling of the `artifact_location` parameter when creating an experiment. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by using a fragment component `#` in the artifact location URI to read arbitrary files on the server in the context of the server\u0027s process. This issue is similar to CVE-2023-6909 but utilizes a different component of the URI to achieve the same effect.",
"id": "BIT-mlflow-2024-1594",
"modified": "2025-05-20T10:02:07.006Z",
"published": "2025-02-04T07:21:32.028Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/424b6f6b-e778-4a2b-b860-39730d396f3e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1594"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Local File Read via Path Traversal in mlflow/mlflow"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…