Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:58
Modified
2025-04-03 14:40
Summary
Details

An issue in MLFlow versions 2.8.1 and before allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to REST API.

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "mlflow",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/mlflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-43472"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:lfprojects:mlflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "High"
  },
  "details": "An issue in MLFlow versions 2.8.1 and before allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to REST API.",
  "id": "BIT-mlflow-2023-43472",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T14:40:37.652Z",
  "published": "2024-03-06T10:58:17.282Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.contrastsecurity.com/security-influencers/discovering-mlflow-framework-zero-day-vulnerability-machine-language-model-security-contrast-security"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-43472"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.5.0"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.