Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From version 5.101.6 to 6.19.2, incomplete CSRF protections around /session/verify made it possible to use OTCs in login sessions different from the requesting session. In some scenarios this might have made it easier for phishers to take over a Ghost site. This issue has been patched in version 6.19.3.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "ghost",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/ghost"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.101.6"
},
{
"fixed": "6.19.3"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29784"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ghost:ghost:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*"
],
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From version 5.101.6 to 6.19.2, incomplete CSRF protections around /session/verify made it possible to use OTCs in login sessions different from the requesting session. In some scenarios this might have made it easier for phishers to take over a Ghost site. This issue has been patched in version 6.19.3.",
"id": "BIT-ghost-2026-29784",
"modified": "2026-09-08T08:34:36.952Z",
"published": "2026-03-10T08:40:17.691Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/ec065a774fa125953d2aa644a59cd8990329e0a0"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/security/advisories/GHSA-9m84-wc28-w895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29784"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2",
"summary": "Ghost: Incomplete CSRF protections around OTC use"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.