Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:51
Modified
2025-04-03 14:40
Summary
Details

Appsmith v1.7.11 was discovered to allow attackers to execute an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via redirecting incoming requests to the AWS internal metadata endpoint.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "appsmith",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/appsmith"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.7.11"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.7.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-38298"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:appsmith:appsmith:1.7.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
      "cpe:2.3:a:appsmith:appsmith:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "High"
  },
  "details": "Appsmith v1.7.11 was discovered to allow attackers to execute an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via redirecting incoming requests to the AWS internal metadata endpoint.",
  "id": "BIT-appsmith-2022-38298",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T14:40:37.652Z",
  "published": "2024-03-06T10:51:15.688Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/pull/15782"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-38298"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.5.0"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…