alsa-2025:20962
Vulnerability from osv_almalinux
Published
2025-11-11 00:00
Modified
2025-12-01 08:09
Summary
Important: pcs security update
Details
The pcs packages provide a command-line configuration system for the Pacemaker and Corosync utilities.
Security Fix(es):
- rubygem-rack: Rack QueryParser has an unsafe default allowing params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters (CVE-2025-59830)
- rack: Rack's unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion) (CVE-2025-61770)
- rack: Rack's multipart parser buffers large non?file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion) (CVE-2025-61771)
- rack: Rack memory exhaustion denial of service (CVE-2025-61772)
- rubygem-rack: Unbounded read in
Rack::Requestform parsing can lead to memory exhaustion (CVE-2025-61919)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:9",
"name": "pcs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.10-1.el9_7.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:9",
"name": "pcs-snmp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.10-1.el9_7.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"details": "The pcs packages provide a command-line configuration system for the Pacemaker and Corosync utilities. \n\nSecurity Fix(es): \n\n * rubygem-rack: Rack QueryParser has an unsafe default allowing params_limit bypass via semicolon-separated parameters (CVE-2025-59830)\n * rack: Rack\u0027s unbounded multipart preamble buffering enables DoS (memory exhaustion) (CVE-2025-61770)\n * rack: Rack\u0027s multipart parser buffers large non?file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion) (CVE-2025-61771)\n * rack: Rack memory exhaustion denial of service (CVE-2025-61772)\n * rubygem-rack: Unbounded read in `Rack::Request` form parsing can lead to memory exhaustion (CVE-2025-61919)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n",
"id": "ALSA-2025:20962",
"modified": "2025-12-01T08:09:09Z",
"published": "2025-11-11T00:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:20962"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-59830"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-61770"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-61771"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-61772"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-61919"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2398167"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2402174"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2402175"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2402200"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2403180"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2025-20962.html"
}
],
"related": [
"CVE-2025-59830",
"CVE-2025-61770",
"CVE-2025-61771",
"CVE-2025-61772",
"CVE-2025-61919"
],
"summary": "Important: pcs security update"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…