alsa-2022:7129
Vulnerability from osv_almalinux
Published
2022-10-25 00:00
Modified
2022-10-27 09:34
Summary
Moderate: git-lfs security and bug fix update
Details

Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server.

Security Fix(es):

  • golang.org/x/text: Panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while parsing -u- extension (CVE-2020-28851)
  • golang.org/x/text: Panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while processing bcp47 tag (CVE-2020-28852)
  • golang: net/http: improper sanitization of Transfer-Encoding header (CVE-2022-1705)
  • golang: net/http: handle server errors after sending GOAWAY (CVE-2022-27664)
  • golang: io/fs: stack exhaustion in Glob (CVE-2022-30630)
  • golang: path/filepath: stack exhaustion in Glob (CVE-2022-30632)
  • golang: encoding/gob: stack exhaustion in Decoder.Decode (CVE-2022-30635)
  • golang: net/http/httputil: NewSingleHostReverseProxy - omit X-Forwarded-For not working (CVE-2022-32148)
  • golang: math/big: decoding big.Float and big.Rat types can panic if the encoded message is too short, potentially allowing a denial of service (CVE-2022-32189)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Bug Fix(es):

  • git-lfs needs to be rebuild with golang 1.17.7-1 or above
References
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:8",
        "name": "git-lfs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.13.3-3.el8_6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "details": "Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\n* golang.org/x/text: Panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while parsing -u- extension (CVE-2020-28851)\n* golang.org/x/text: Panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while processing bcp47 tag (CVE-2020-28852)\n* golang: net/http: improper sanitization of Transfer-Encoding header (CVE-2022-1705)\n* golang: net/http: handle server errors after sending GOAWAY (CVE-2022-27664)\n* golang: io/fs: stack exhaustion in Glob (CVE-2022-30630)\n* golang: path/filepath: stack exhaustion in Glob (CVE-2022-30632)\n* golang: encoding/gob: stack exhaustion in Decoder.Decode (CVE-2022-30635)\n* golang: net/http/httputil: NewSingleHostReverseProxy - omit X-Forwarded-For not working (CVE-2022-32148)\n* golang: math/big: decoding big.Float and big.Rat types can panic if the encoded message is too short, potentially allowing a denial of service (CVE-2022-32189)\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n\nBug Fix(es):\n\n* git-lfs needs to be rebuild with golang 1.17.7-1 or above",
  "id": "ALSA-2022:7129",
  "modified": "2022-10-27T09:34:45Z",
  "published": "2022-10-25T00:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:7129"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-28851"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-28852"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1705"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-27664"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-30630"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-30632"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-30635"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-32148"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-32189"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1913333"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1913338"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2107371"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2107374"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2107383"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2107386"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2107388"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2113814"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2124669"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://errata.almalinux.org/8/ALSA-2022-7129.html"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    "CVE-2020-28851",
    "CVE-2020-28852",
    "CVE-2022-1705",
    "CVE-2022-27664",
    "CVE-2022-30630",
    "CVE-2022-30632",
    "CVE-2022-30635",
    "CVE-2022-32148",
    "CVE-2022-32189"
  ],
  "summary": "Moderate: git-lfs security and bug fix update"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.