MAL-2025-47609
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-09-26 09:20
Modified
2025-09-26 09:20
Summary
Malicious code in actix-web (npm)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Credits
Amazon Inspector actran@amazon.com
ReversingLabs www.reversinglabs.com
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "actix-web",
        "purl": "pkg:npm/actix-web"
      },
      "versions": [
        "6.0.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "actran@amazon.com"
      ],
      "name": "Amazon Inspector",
      "type": "FINDER"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://www.reversinglabs.com"
      ],
      "name": "ReversingLabs",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "RLMA-2025-04910",
        "import_time": "2025-09-26T11:05:44.76601221Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-09-26T09:20:10Z",
        "sha256": "88b0fa91297a94008dcb927975b5c1f8537ef815955f3a4c7230431573bd3367",
        "source": "reversing-labs",
        "versions": [
          "6.0.1"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n",
  "id": "MAL-2025-47609",
  "modified": "2025-09-26T09:20:10Z",
  "published": "2025-09-26T09:20:10Z",
  "schema_version": "1.5.0",
  "summary": "Malicious code in actix-web (npm)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.