MAL-2025-46904
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-09-01 09:47
Modified
2025-09-01 09:47
Summary
Malicious code in diff-analysis (RubyGems)
Details
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: ossf-package-analysis (53f5c59231a450ff5c362e5a1f69715ca48a0ee311ba81d90daa03baef384a1d)
The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'diff-analysis' @ 0.1.0.r8ff4356 (rubygems) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "diff-analysis"
},
"versions": [
"0.1.0.r8ff4356"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
"https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
],
"name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"import_time": "2025-09-08T03:43:51.303579535Z",
"modified_time": "2025-09-01T09:47:29Z",
"sha256": "53f5c59231a450ff5c362e5a1f69715ca48a0ee311ba81d90daa03baef384a1d",
"source": "ossf-package-analysis",
"versions": [
"0.1.0.r8ff4356"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (53f5c59231a450ff5c362e5a1f69715ca48a0ee311ba81d90daa03baef384a1d)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027diff-analysis\u0027 @ 0.1.0.r8ff4356 (rubygems) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
"id": "MAL-2025-46904",
"modified": "2025-09-01T09:47:29Z",
"published": "2025-09-01T09:47:29Z",
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Malicious code in diff-analysis (RubyGems)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…