MAL-2024-6664
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2024-06-25 13:48
Modified
2024-10-24 01:02
Summary
Malicious code in ar-lightning (RubyGems)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Credits
ReversingLabs www.reversinglabs.com
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "ar-lightning",
        "purl": "pkg:gem/ar-lightning"
      },
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://www.reversinglabs.com"
      ],
      "name": "ReversingLabs",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "RLMA-2024-05470",
        "import_time": "2024-06-28T02:52:04.367428952Z",
        "modified_time": "2024-06-25T13:48:46Z",
        "sha256": "5b5b8c442341dc148d0ed8adf4544e96166709361f02d7aee4550ba1b2abc5ef",
        "source": "reversing-labs",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "RLUA-2024-09989",
        "import_time": "2024-10-24T01:00:58.208063274Z",
        "modified_time": "2024-10-16T15:00:09Z",
        "sha256": "3e317e4483057962e6e3d8699c2570092c92570a8c16f277d8b29ba19cb0039f",
        "source": "reversing-labs"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n",
  "id": "MAL-2024-6664",
  "modified": "2024-10-24T01:02:00Z",
  "published": "2024-06-25T13:48:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ARTICLE",
      "url": "https://blog.reversinglabs.com/blog/mining-for-malicious-ruby-gems"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.5.0",
  "summary": "Malicious code in ar-lightning (RubyGems)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.