MAL-2023-8310
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2023-10-09 06:10
Modified
2023-10-09 06:10
Summary
Malicious code in cephlib (PyPI)
Details
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: ossf-package-analysis (f82a5ba62b790856947d686397170162bf743b168fd9d66008ed6501b465d5af)
The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'cephlib' @ 0.0.2 (pypi) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "cephlib"
},
"versions": [
"0.0.2"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
"https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
],
"name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"import_time": "2023-10-09T06:35:18.628833745Z",
"modified_time": "2023-10-09T06:10:45Z",
"sha256": "f82a5ba62b790856947d686397170162bf743b168fd9d66008ed6501b465d5af",
"source": "ossf-package-analysis",
"versions": [
"0.0.2"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (f82a5ba62b790856947d686397170162bf743b168fd9d66008ed6501b465d5af)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027cephlib\u0027 @ 0.0.2 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.\n",
"id": "MAL-2023-8310",
"modified": "2023-10-09T06:10:45Z",
"published": "2023-10-09T06:10:45Z",
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Malicious code in cephlib (PyPI)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…