GHSA-P6P8-Q4PJ-F74M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-03-29 16:28 – Updated: 2021-03-19 19:21
VLAI?
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation in twitter-stream
Details
In voloko twitter-stream 0.1.16, missing TLS hostname validation allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library (because eventmachine is misused).
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "twitter-stream"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.1.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-24392"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-19T19:21:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-19T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In voloko twitter-stream 0.1.16, missing TLS hostname validation allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library (because eventmachine is misused).",
"id": "GHSA-p6p8-q4pj-f74m",
"modified": "2021-03-19T19:21:49Z",
"published": "2021-03-29T16:28:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-24392"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/voloko/twitter-stream"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2020-097-voloko-twitter-stream"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Improper Certificate Validation in twitter-stream"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…