GHSA-GP6M-FQ6H-CJCX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-27 21:47 – Updated: 2024-03-04 04:29
VLAI
Summary
Magento LTS vulnerable to stored XSS in admin file form
Details

Summary

OpenMage is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields.

Details

Mage_Adminhtml_Block_System_Config_Form_Field_File does not escape filename value in certain situations. Same as: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20717

PoC

  1. Create empty file with this filename: <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>.crt
  2. Go to System > Configuration > Sales | Payment Methonds.
  3. Click Configure on PayPal Express Checkout.
  4. Choose API Certificate from dropdown API Authentication Methods.
  5. Choose the XSS-file and click Save Config.
  6. Profit, alerts "1" -> XSS.
  7. Reload, alerts "1" -> Stored XSS.

Impact

Affects admins that have access to any fileupload field in admin in core or custom implementations. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "openmage/magento-lts"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "20.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "20.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "openmage/magento-lts"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "19.5.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-27T21:47:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nOpenMage is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields.\n\n### Details\n`Mage_Adminhtml_Block_System_Config_Form_Field_File` does not escape filename value in certain situations.\nSame as: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20717\n\n### PoC\n1. Create empty file with this filename: `\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e.crt`\n2. Go to _System_ \u003e _Configuration_ \u003e _Sales | Payment Methonds_.\n3. Click **Configure** on _PayPal Express Checkout_.\n4. Choose **API Certificate** from dropdown _API Authentication Methods_.\n5. Choose the XSS-file and click **Save Config**.\n6. Profit, alerts \"1\" -\u003e XSS.\n7. Reload, alerts \"1\" -\u003e Stored XSS.\n\n### Impact\nAffects admins that have access to any fileupload field in admin in core or custom implementations.\nMalicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim\u2019s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-gp6m-fq6h-cjcx",
  "modified": "2024-03-04T04:29:16Z",
  "published": "2024-02-27T21:47:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenMage/magento-lts/security/advisories/GHSA-gp6m-fq6h-cjcx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20717"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenMage/magento-lts"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Magento LTS vulnerable to stored XSS in admin file form"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.