CVE-2026-67620 (GCVE-0-2026-67620)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-08 16:03 – Updated: 2026-08-14 16:51 X_Open Source Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Flowise 3.1.4 SSRF via fetch-links Endpoint Incomplete Deny-List
Summary
Flowise through 3.1.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the SSRF guard implemented in httpSecurity.ts, where the DEFAULT_DENY_LIST omits the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure metadata endpoint 192.0.0.192 and the Alibaba Cloud metadata endpoint 100.100.100.200, allowing authenticated attackers to force the server to issue arbitrary GET requests to cloud instance metadata services. Attackers can send requests to the fetch-links API endpoint with a crafted URL parameter, bypassing deny-list validation including redirect-based bypasses, to reach instance metadata services and expose instance identity data and role credentials on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or Alibaba Cloud deployments, with unauthenticated access possible when URL-fetching nodes exist in public chatflows.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-10 13:39 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/abdugafforov-bobur/CVE-2026-67… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://flowiseai.com/sunset | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-ssrf… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-08-04 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-67620",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T13:39:26.798218Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T13:39:38.079Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/FlowiseAI/Flowise",
"product": "Flowise",
"repo": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise",
"vendor": "FlowiseAI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:flowiseai:flowise:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "3.1.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Bobur Abdugafforov (Mahadsec)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Flowise through 3.1.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the SSRF guard implemented in httpSecurity.ts, where the DEFAULT_DENY_LIST omits the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure metadata endpoint 192.0.0.192 and the Alibaba Cloud metadata endpoint 100.100.100.200, allowing authenticated attackers to force the server to issue arbitrary GET requests to cloud instance metadata services. Attackers can send requests to the fetch-links API endpoint with a crafted URL parameter, bypassing deny-list validation including redirect-based bypasses, to reach instance metadata services and expose instance identity data and role credentials on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or Alibaba Cloud deployments, with unauthenticated access possible when URL-fetching nodes exist in public chatflows."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T16:51:04.430Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Researcher Disclosure",
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/abdugafforov-bobur/CVE-2026-67620-poc"
},
{
"name": "Sunset Announcement",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://flowiseai.com/sunset"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-ssrf-via-fetch-links-endpoint-incomplete-deny-list"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source",
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"title": "Flowise 3.1.4 SSRF via fetch-links Endpoint Incomplete Deny-List",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-67620",
"datePublished": "2026-08-08T16:03:39.904Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-29T21:07:39.203Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T16:51:04.430Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-67620",
"date": "2026-10-31",
"epss": "0.00463",
"percentile": "0.40155"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/FlowiseAI/Flowise",
"product": "Flowise",
"repo": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise",
"vendor": "FlowiseAI",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:flowiseai:flowise:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9B13DD07-EC62-44CC-8602-EEAE7960C9B3",
"versionEndIncluding": "3.1.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Flowise through 3.1.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the SSRF guard implemented in httpSecurity.ts, where the DEFAULT_DENY_LIST omits the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure metadata endpoint 192.0.0.192 and the Alibaba Cloud metadata endpoint 100.100.100.200, allowing authenticated attackers to force the server to issue arbitrary GET requests to cloud instance metadata services. Attackers can send requests to the fetch-links API endpoint with a crafted URL parameter, bypassing deny-list validation including redirect-based bypasses, to reach instance metadata services and expose instance identity data and role credentials on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or Alibaba Cloud deployments, with unauthenticated access possible when URL-fetching nodes exist in public chatflows."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Flowise hasta la versi\u00f3n 3.1.4 contiene una vulnerabilidad de falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n del lado del servidor en el guard SSRF implementado en httpSecurity.ts, donde la DEFAULT_DENY_LIST omite el endpoint de metadatos de Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 192.0.0.192 y el endpoint de metadatos de Alibaba Cloud 100.100.100.200, permitiendo a atacantes autenticados forzar al servidor a emitir peticiones GET arbitrarias a servicios de metadatos de instancias en la nube. Los atacantes pueden enviar peticiones al endpoint de la API fetch-links con un par\u00e1metro de URL manipulado, eludiendo la validaci\u00f3n de la lista de denegaci\u00f3n, incluyendo los bypasses basados en redirecciones, para alcanzar servicios de metadatos de instancias y exponer datos de identidad de instancias y credenciales de rol en despliegues de Oracle Cloud Infrastructure o Alibaba Cloud, siendo posible el acceso no autenticado cuando existen nodos de obtenci\u00f3n de URL en chatflows p\u00fablicos."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-67620",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T16:10:00.153",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
"impactScore": 4.0,
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-67620",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-10T13:39:26.798218Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-08T16:16:49.420",
"references": [
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"tags": [
"Not Applicable"
],
"url": "https://flowiseai.com/sunset"
},
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/abdugafforov-bobur/CVE-2026-67620-poc"
},
{
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-ssrf-via-fetch-links-endpoint-incomplete-deny-list"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.