CVE-2026-41000 (GCVE-0-2026-41000)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-11 05:04 – Updated: 2026-06-23 19:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
WSS4J validation does not use configured replay cache
Summary
Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.
Affected versions:
Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-11 15:13 UTC
CWE
- CWE-294 - Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | Spring Web Services |
Affected:
5.0.0 , < 5.0.1.1
(custom)
Affected: 4.1.0 , < 4.1.3.1 (custom) Affected: 4.0.0 , < 4.0.19 (custom) Affected: 3.1.0 , < 3.1.9 (custom) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41000",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:13:14.068411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T16:13:44.263Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Spring Web Services",
"vendor": "Spring",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.1.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.\n\nAffected versions:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8."
}
],
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.\n\nAffected versions:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Attackers can re-submit still-valid cryptographic material within the acceptance window because WSS4J ReplayCache instances are not consistently wired into RequestData for validation-time checks even when configured."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-294",
"description": "CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T19:53:11.880Z",
"orgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"shortName": "vmware"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-41000"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "WSS4J validation does not use configured replay cache",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"assignerShortName": "vmware",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41000",
"datePublished": "2026-06-11T05:04:24.413Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-16T02:19:12.970Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T19:53:11.880Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-41000",
"date": "2026-11-01",
"epss": "0.00223",
"percentile": "0.12973"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Spring Web Services",
"vendor": "Spring",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.1.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@vmware.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:spring_web_services:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4B633BE6-BF68-4983-9CCC-DB3D353B5E5B",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:spring_web_services:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "78560577-BEE7-4F51-AED1-07BABD369CE9",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.0.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:spring_web_services:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A7AB4F88-7609-466A-A799-FD19E8D07284",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.1.3.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:spring_web_services:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5E33A13E-4CED-4B68-8E37-8ACE603F3DAC",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.0.1.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.\n\nAffected versions:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor no cableaba consistentemente instancias de Apache WSS4J ReplayCache en RequestData para comprobaciones en tiempo de validaci\u00f3n. Como resultado, las protecciones contra la repetici\u00f3n de nonces de UsernameToken y marcas de tiempo de creaci\u00f3n, elementos Timestamp, y ciertas sem\u00e1nticas de un solo uso de SAML podr\u00edan ser ineficaces incluso cuando los operadores configuraban una cach\u00e9 de repetici\u00f3n en el interceptor.\n\nVersiones afectadas:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 hasta 5.0.1; 4.1.0 hasta 4.1.3; 4.0.0 hasta 4.0.18; 3.1.0 hasta 3.1.8."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-41000",
"lastModified": "2026-09-04T18:14:58.660",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@vmware.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41000",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:13:14.068411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-11T07:16:28.037",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@vmware.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory",
"Mitigation"
],
"url": "https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-41000"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@vmware.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-294"
}
],
"source": "security@vmware.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-28T07:33:33+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-41000",
"id": "CVE-2026-41000",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-11T05:04:24.413000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Spring Web Services: Spring Web Services: Replay protection bypass due to improper cache integration",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41000.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41000",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-11T15:13:14.068411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T15:13:18.609Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Spring Web Services",
"vendor": "Spring",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.1.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.\n\nAffected versions:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8."
}
],
"value": "Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor.\n\nAffected versions:\nSpring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Attackers can re-submit still-valid cryptographic material within the acceptance window because WSS4J ReplayCache instances are not consistently wired into RequestData for validation-time checks even when configured."
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-294",
"description": "CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T19:53:11.880Z",
"orgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"shortName": "vmware"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-41000"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "WSS4J validation does not use configured replay cache",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
"assignerShortName": "vmware",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41000",
"datePublished": "2026-06-11T05:04:24.413Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-16T02:19:12.970Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T19:53:11.880Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.