CVE-2026-16328 (GCVE-0-2026-16328)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-29 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-29 19:11
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure
Summary
In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server's configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server's Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.
Severity
8.6 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-29 19:10 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-16328",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Tooling",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue was identified by HE WEI (\u30ae\u30ab\u30af)."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
"orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"shortName": "HashiCorp"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-16328",
"datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-16328",
"date": "2026-10-28",
"epss": "0.00394",
"percentile": "0.33463"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Tooling",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@hashicorp.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En consul-mcp-server, las versiones 0.1.0 hasta la 0.1.3 no restring\u00edan c\u00f3mo se suministraba la direcci\u00f3n del backend de Consul, permitiendo a un cliente conectado anular la direcci\u00f3n de Consul configurada del servidor a trav\u00e9s de una cabecera de solicitud. Esto puede permitir a un cliente malicioso redirigir el tr\u00e1fico de la API de Consul del servidor a un endpoint controlado por un atacante, potencialmente exfiltrando el token de Consul configurado en el servidor. Esta vulnerabilidad, CVE-2026-16328, est\u00e1 corregida en consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-16328",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T13:10:00.147",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.0,
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-16328",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-29T19:16:45.060",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@hashicorp.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security@hashicorp.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-16328",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:00.399Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"64 bit",
"32 bit",
"x86",
"ARM",
"MacOS",
"Windows",
"Linux"
],
"product": "Tooling",
"repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
"vendor": "HashiCorp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue was identified by HE WEI (\u30ae\u30ab\u30af)."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-664",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
"orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"shortName": "HashiCorp"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
"assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-16328",
"datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.