CVE-2017-16858 (GCVE-0-2017-16858)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-01-31 14:00 – Updated: 2024-09-17 00:40
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
The 'crowd-application' plugin module (notably used by the Google Apps plugin) in Atlassian Crowd from version 1.5.0 before version 3.1.2 allowed an attacker to impersonate a Crowd user in REST requests by being able to authenticate to a directory bound to an application using the feature. Given the following situation: the Crowd application is bound to directory 1 and has a user called admin and the Google Apps application is bound to directory 2, which also has a user called admin, it was possible to authenticate REST requests using the credentials of the user coming from directory 2 and impersonate the user from directory 1.
Severity
6.8 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
Date Public
2018-01-30 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T20:35:21.278Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Crowd",
"vendor": "Atlassian",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "from 1.5.0 before 3.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2018-01-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The \u0027crowd-application\u0027 plugin module (notably used by the Google Apps plugin) in Atlassian Crowd from version 1.5.0 before version 3.1.2 allowed an attacker to impersonate a Crowd user in REST requests by being able to authenticate to a directory bound to an application using the feature. Given the following situation: the Crowd application is bound to directory 1 and has a user called admin and the Google Apps application is bound to directory 2, which also has a user called admin, it was possible to authenticate REST requests using the credentials of the user coming from directory 2 and impersonate the user from directory 1."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-01-31T13:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "f08a6ab8-ed46-4c22-8884-d911ccfe3c66",
"shortName": "atlassian"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@atlassian.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2018-01-30T00:00:00",
"ID": "CVE-2017-16858",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Crowd",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "from 1.5.0 before 3.1.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Atlassian"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The \u0027crowd-application\u0027 plugin module (notably used by the Google Apps plugin) in Atlassian Crowd from version 1.5.0 before version 3.1.2 allowed an attacker to impersonate a Crowd user in REST requests by being able to authenticate to a directory bound to an application using the feature. Given the following situation: the Crowd application is bound to directory 1 and has a user called admin and the Google Apps application is bound to directory 2, which also has a user called admin, it was possible to authenticate REST requests using the credentials of the user coming from directory 2 and impersonate the user from directory 1."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f08a6ab8-ed46-4c22-8884-d911ccfe3c66",
"assignerShortName": "atlassian",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-16858",
"datePublished": "2018-01-31T14:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-11-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T00:40:54.506Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2017-16858",
"date": "2026-10-29",
"epss": "0.00566",
"percentile": "0.46891"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:atlassian:crowd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A3767E19-3A9F-4DB6-B1FE-4061E4877AB5",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.5.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The \u0027crowd-application\u0027 plugin module (notably used by the Google Apps plugin) in Atlassian Crowd from version 1.5.0 before version 3.1.2 allowed an attacker to impersonate a Crowd user in REST requests by being able to authenticate to a directory bound to an application using the feature. Given the following situation: the Crowd application is bound to directory 1 and has a user called admin and the Google Apps application is bound to directory 2, which also has a user called admin, it was possible to authenticate REST requests using the credentials of the user coming from directory 2 and impersonate the user from directory 1."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El m\u00f3dulo del plugin \"crowd-application\" (empleado principalmente por el plugin Google Apps) en Atlassian Crowd, desde la versi\u00f3n 1.5.0 y antes de la versi\u00f3n 3.1.2, permit\u00eda que un atacante suplantase a un usuario de Crowd en peticiones REST pudiendo autenticarse en un directorio vinculado a una aplicaci\u00f3n que emplee esa caracter\u00edstica. En la siguiente situaci\u00f3n: la aplicaci\u00f3n Crowd est\u00e1 enlazada al directorio 1 y tiene un usuario llamado admin y la aplicaci\u00f3n Google Apps est\u00e1 enlazada al directorio 2, que tambi\u00e9n tiene un usuario llamado admin, era posible autenticar peticiones REST empleando las credenciales del usuario que viene del directorio 2 y suplanta al usuario del directorio 1."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-16858",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:17:06.860",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.9,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-01-31T14:29:00.563",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@atlassian.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CWD-5009"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@atlassian.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security@atlassian.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.