CVE-2010-0992 (GCVE-0-2010-0992)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2010-04-09 17:00 – Updated: 2024-08-07 01:06
VLAI?
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pulse CMS Basic 1.2.2 and 1.2.3, and possibly Pulse Pro before 1.3.2, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) upload image files, (2) delete image files, or (3) create blocks.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
Date Public ?
2010-04-08 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T01:06:52.605Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/"
},
{
"name": "39046",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39046"
},
{
"name": "20100409 Secunia Research: Pulse CMS Cross-Site Request Forgery",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510619/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://pulsecms.com/blog.php"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2010-04-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pulse CMS Basic 1.2.2 and 1.2.3, and possibly Pulse Pro before 1.3.2, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) upload image files, (2) delete image files, or (3) create blocks."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-10T18:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "44d08088-2bea-4760-83a6-1e9be26b15ab",
"shortName": "flexera"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/"
},
{
"name": "39046",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39046"
},
{
"name": "20100409 Secunia Research: Pulse CMS Cross-Site Request Forgery",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510619/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "http://pulsecms.com/blog.php"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com",
"ID": "CVE-2010-0992",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pulse CMS Basic 1.2.2 and 1.2.3, and possibly Pulse Pro before 1.3.2, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) upload image files, (2) delete image files, or (3) create blocks."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/"
},
{
"name": "39046",
"refsource": "SECUNIA",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39046"
},
{
"name": "20100409 Secunia Research: Pulse CMS Cross-Site Request Forgery",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510619/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "http://pulsecms.com/blog.php",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://pulsecms.com/blog.php"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "44d08088-2bea-4760-83a6-1e9be26b15ab",
"assignerShortName": "flexera",
"cveId": "CVE-2010-0992",
"datePublished": "2010-04-09T17:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2010-03-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T01:06:52.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2010-0992",
"date": "2026-05-07",
"epss": "0.00142",
"percentile": "0.33927"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-0992\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com\",\"published\":\"2010-04-09T17:30:00.303\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:13:23.040\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pulse CMS Basic 1.2.2 and 1.2.3, and possibly Pulse Pro before 1.3.2, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) upload image files, (2) delete image files, or (3) create blocks.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vulnerabilidad de falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n en sitios cruzados (CSRF) en Pulse CMS Basic v1.2.2 y v1.2.3, y probablemente Pulse Pro anterior v1.3.2, permite a atacantes remotos secuestar la autenticaci\u00f3n de otros usuarios de peticiones que cargan (1) ficheros im\u00e1genes, (2) borra ficheros im\u00e1genes, o (3) crea bloques.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":true,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:pulsecms:pulse_cms:1.2.2:-:basic:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"49648AF1-DAD8-44C6-BEDF-8F19DF180E8B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:pulsecms:pulse_cms:1.2.3:-:basic:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6902B6AA-D3A3-4453-B3C5-16DE2EB660CC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:pulsecms:pulse_cms:1.3.2:-:pro:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FFA8814A-69C9-48B4-B8BB-3265C7058A8D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://pulsecms.com/blog.php\",\"source\":\"PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/39046\",\"source\":\"PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/\",\"source\":\"PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510619/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"PSIRT-CNA@flexerasoftware.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://pulsecms.com/blog.php\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/39046\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-46/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510619/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…