CVE-2002-2204 (GCVE-0-2002-2204)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2005-11-16 21:17 – Updated: 2024-09-17 00:56
VLAI?
Summary
The default --checksig setting in RPM Package Manager 4.0.4 checks that a package's signature is valid without listing who signed it, which can allow remote attackers to make it appear that a malicious package comes from a trusted source.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:51:17.771Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "5594",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5594"
},
{
"name": "rpm-improper-sig-verification(10011)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10011.php"
},
{
"name": "20020829 RPM verification",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/001167.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The default --checksig setting in RPM Package Manager 4.0.4 checks that a package\u0027s signature is valid without listing who signed it, which can allow remote attackers to make it appear that a malicious package comes from a trusted source."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2005-11-16T21:17:00Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "5594",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5594"
},
{
"name": "rpm-improper-sig-verification(10011)",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_XF"
],
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10011.php"
},
{
"name": "20020829 RPM verification",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC"
],
"url": "http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/001167.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2002-2204",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The default --checksig setting in RPM Package Manager 4.0.4 checks that a package\u0027s signature is valid without listing who signed it, which can allow remote attackers to make it appear that a malicious package comes from a trusted source."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "5594",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5594"
},
{
"name": "rpm-improper-sig-verification(10011)",
"refsource": "XF",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10011.php"
},
{
"name": "20020829 RPM verification",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/001167.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2002-2204",
"datePublished": "2005-11-16T21:17:00Z",
"dateReserved": "2005-11-16T00:00:00Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T00:56:21.041Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2002-2204\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2002-12-31T05:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-03T01:03:51.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The default --checksig setting in RPM Package Manager 4.0.4 checks that a package\u0027s signature is valid without listing who signed it, which can allow remote attackers to make it appear that a malicious package comes from a trusted source.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":true,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:redhat_package_manager:4.0.2-71:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"31D3977B-32C4-4F6E-AA67-184AF775DA65\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:redhat_package_manager:4.0.2-72:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ECDDB82C-4EEB-458E-95D4-98D0B167A165\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:redhat_package_manager:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"84939DAD-3CB3-4FBE-9829-6CC8C29DA4BB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:redhat_package_manager:4.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AEBEA8BA-5EA3-44A3-ABDC-199977AA3AAE\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/001167.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10011.php\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5594\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-August/001167.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10011.php\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5594\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}],\"evaluatorSolution\":\"A large degree of social engineering and user interaction is neccessary to exploit this vulnerbility.\",\"vendorComments\":[{\"organization\":\"Red Hat\",\"comment\":\"We do not believe this is a security vulnerability. This is the documented and expected behaviour of rpm.\",\"lastModified\":\"2006-08-30T00:00:00\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…